Los administradores de TransicionEstructural no se responsabilizan de las opiniones vertidas por los usuarios del foro. Cada usuario asume la responsabilidad de los comentarios publicados.
0 Usuarios y 1 Visitante están viendo este tema.
Por qué no seguís las noticias que subís? Ah carallo. Poneis aquí en el hilo cualquier cosa que han llevado al juzgado los de trump. 'se confirma el fraude en Pensilvania' . Me recuerda a Jose Maríá García 'se confirma el escandalo en Las Gaunas'. The claims have no merit' La noticia de Fox News. Los tres jueces nombrados por republicanos. Ustedes mismos.
Cita de: Maloserá en Noviembre 27, 2020, 19:03:01 pmPor qué no seguís las noticias que subís? Ah carallo. Poneis aquí en el hilo cualquier cosa que han llevado al juzgado los de trump. 'se confirma el fraude en Pensilvania' . Me recuerda a Jose Maríá García 'se confirma el escandalo en Las Gaunas'. The claims have no merit' La noticia de Fox News. Los tres jueces nombrados por republicanos. Ustedes mismos. por que esperamos que otros conforeros como tú nos traigan el seguimiento,Esto no pretende ser un debate donde 4 foreros defienden posturas sino un hilo sobre USA donde traemos links relevantes y nos dedicamos a explicitar las conclusiones a las que llegamos,Si estás sacando conclusiones sobre los foreros, sin duda es porque no se aportaron suficientes links, que no eran relevantes, etc, Pero obervar que links pueden ser problemáticos y sacar conclusiones sobre los foreros, tampoco es relevante (porque no aporta nada)
La verdad es que a veces me quedo en shock, cuando veo que en este foro se aceptan como 'noticias' que a mi me hacen sonar las alarmas en segundos. Porque sé que los que estamos en este foro todos tratamos de estar informados ,y la propia estructura de funcionamiento, donde cualquier opinión puede ser rebatida con minima moderación, pues esto deberíá llevar por 'selección natural' a que cualquier noticia que se lea aquí acabaría siendo 'seria'Estoy especialmente sensibilizado por este asunto (creo que lo he contado en otro post) por ver la transformación que ha tenido una amiga, profesora, después de pasarse el primer confinamiento sóla y leyendo todo tipo de explicaciones alternativas al Covid. Y lo tristemente gracioso es que ella me miraba como si fuese yo el que doy pena, por no darme cuenta de los hilos que mueven el mundo (ya os imagináis: Soros/Gates/WEforum/inmigración-para-reemplazar la raza blanca etc). Tiene un doctorado universitario.
Cita de: sudden and sharp en Noviembre 28, 2020, 19:58:21 pmPennsylvania Judge Backs Trump Claims Over Mail-In Ballots, Says 'Unlikely Constitutional'https://www.zerohedge.com/political/pennsylvania-judge-backs-trump-says-election-unlikely-constitutionalAfter a Pennsylvania Judge blocked the state from 'taking any further steps' to complete the certification of the presidential race on Wednesday - she dropped a detailed opinion on Friday justifying her decision, which concludes that the state's changes to mail-in balloting procedures were likely illegal.Los de Dominion además de fraudulentos deben ser tontos porque estan equivocándose en la dirección contrariaBiden picks up small number of votes in Milwaukee County after Trump-requested recounthttps://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/27/politics/milwaukee-county-certifies-election-result/index.htmlThe results showed a net gain of 132 votes for Biden, with President Donald Trump receiving 134,482 votes and Biden receiving 317,527 after the recount, the Milwaukee County Board of Canvassers announced Friday night.
Pennsylvania Judge Backs Trump Claims Over Mail-In Ballots, Says 'Unlikely Constitutional'https://www.zerohedge.com/political/pennsylvania-judge-backs-trump-says-election-unlikely-constitutionalAfter a Pennsylvania Judge blocked the state from 'taking any further steps' to complete the certification of the presidential race on Wednesday - she dropped a detailed opinion on Friday justifying her decision, which concludes that the state's changes to mail-in balloting procedures were likely illegal.
The campaign also objected to 2,197 ballots that had been "cured," a legally allowed action in which an election official fills in a missing piece of information on a ballot envelope, often identified because the official did it in a different ink from the voter.According to the Milwaukee County Clerk's office, the Trump campaign has signaled it will appeal the certification decision, based on the dispute over these segregated votes
Un incendio destruye cerca de 50,000 máquinas de voto y 582 ordenadores en Venezuela. Juste au moment où ces machines sont mises en cause comme élément de fraude par l'équipe Trump.évidemment, [size=150]c'est un sacré hasard[/size] mais heureusement seuls des complotistes à l'esprit tordu pourraient y voir quelque chose de suspect.https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-51800316
Creo que ya lo dije en el ppal.Trump, precisamente por ser un cipolla al que no le importa desagradar, es una persona de la que es fácil creer lo que dice. Su historia es creíble precisamente porque es un tipo al que no le importa decir lo que el cree que es verdad, incluso aunque resulte ofensivo.No se si será verdad o mentira. Lo que creo, es que él está convencido de que dice la verdad. Y cuando alguien es tan vehemente, incluso a costa de desagradar tanto y a tantos, tiene muchas papeletas (perdon por el chiste) para hacerse con el relato.
CitarWare County, Ga has broken the Dominion algorithm:Using sequestered Dominion Equipment, Ware County ran a equal number of Trump votes and Biden votes through the Tabulator and the Tabulator reported a 26% lead for Biden.https://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335557576587665408?s=20CitarThose conducting the test were so shocked that they ran the same ballots again. The same results appeared.ONE PIECE OF THE PUZZLE SOLVED. (It is worth noting that this was one County, and on one Tabulator alone.https://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335557579905359872?s=20CitarThe use of illegal and/or fabricated ballots is an additional issue altogether, but this is sufficient evidence to question the validity of the ENTIRE Election in the 28 states that used Dominion software. Source: Debbie Browning Tift Co Republican Partyhttps://twitter.com/robbhurstCPA/status/1335557582145155072?s=20Bombshell: Trump Legal Team Witness Alleged That Ware County Audit Results Revealed Dominion Machine Flipped Ballots from Trump to Bidenhttps://georgiastarnews.com/2020/12/05/trump-legal-team-witness-alleged-that-ware-county-audit-results-revealed-dominion-machine-flipped-ballots-from-trump-to-biden/
Ware County, Ga has broken the Dominion algorithm:Using sequestered Dominion Equipment, Ware County ran a equal number of Trump votes and Biden votes through the Tabulator and the Tabulator reported a 26% lead for Biden.
Those conducting the test were so shocked that they ran the same ballots again. The same results appeared.ONE PIECE OF THE PUZZLE SOLVED. (It is worth noting that this was one County, and on one Tabulator alone.
The use of illegal and/or fabricated ballots is an additional issue altogether, but this is sufficient evidence to question the validity of the ENTIRE Election in the 28 states that used Dominion software. Source: Debbie Browning Tift Co Republican Party
The state of Texas filed a lawsuit at the US Supreme Court against Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin on the grounds that various changes to their voting rules or procedures - either through the courts or via executive actions - violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they did not go through the legislatures.Texas also argues that differences in rules and procedures in different counties within the same state violates the Constitution's Equal Protection Clause, and that "voting irregularities" occurred in these states as a result.The lawsuit, filed shortly before midnight on Monday, asks the Supreme Court to allow their legislators to directly appoint electors, according to Breitbart.Citar Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution. … This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.Texas was able to approach the Supreme Court because Article III grants it status as the 'court of first impression' where it has original jurisdiction, such as when two states are in dispute, according to the report.
Certain officials in the Defendant States presented the pandemic as the justification for ignoring state laws regarding absentee and mail-in voting. The Defendant States flooded their citizenry with tens of millions of ballot applications and ballots in derogation of statutory controls as to how they are lawfully received, evaluated, and counted. Whether well intentioned or not, these unconstitutional acts had the same uniform effect—they made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States. Those changes are inconsistent with relevant state laws and were made by non-legislative entities, without any consent by the state legislatures. The acts of these officials thus directly violated the Constitution. … This case presents a question of law: Did the Defendant States violate the Electors Clause by taking non-legislative actions to change the election rules that would govern the appointment of presidential electors? These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law, which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution. By these unlawful acts, the Defendant States have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but their actions have also debased the votes of citizens in Plaintiff State and other States that remained loyal to the Constitution.