PPCC: Pisitófilos Creditófagos. Primavera 2024

[asustadísimos]

[Perder a Derby sería dificilísimo de sobrellevar.]

[Cadavre Exquis]

https://countrymeters.info/es/Spain

Saludos.

[sudden and sharp]

SATURDAY'S OFFTOPIC/





/OFF




----
https://elpais.com/noticias/max/

[Derby]

https://www.newsweek.com/china-moves-away-us-dollar-hit-new-milestone-1901901

China's Moves Away From US Dollar Hit New Milestone

China sold a record amount of U.S. government bonds in the first quarter of 2024, according to U.S. Treasury data, continuing what many economists believe is a strategic shift away from dollar assets.

In the first three months of 2024, China sold $53.3 billion worth of U.S. Treasurys and agency bonds.

China's actions come as it rapidly increases its purchases of gold and other commodities, part of a broader strategy to diversify its assets amid rising geopolitical tensions with the U.S. Observing the economic impact of sanctions on Russia following its 2022 invasion of Ukraine, some analysts say China aims to mitigate similar risks.

Craig Shapiro, a macro adviser to LaDuc Trading, identified three primary reasons for this trend. "The handling of Russian reserves by the U.S. and other G7 countries, including threats of expropriations and sanctions, likely prompted China to reduce its exposure to U.S. treasury assets to avoid being similarly targeted," he told Newsweek.



He also noted the impact of rising U.S. fiscal deficits.

"China probably anticipates that U.S. interest rates will continue to rise due to persistent fiscal deficits, making it prudent to sell now rather than risk losses or repayment in devalued dollars," he added. Selling these holdings could help China manage its domestic economy without risking the devaluation of the yuan.

U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell said this week the monetary authority was likely to maintain the federal funds interest rate of 5.25-5.50 percent, where it has remained since last July, longer than previously expected, due to persistent inflation.

Brad Setser, an economist at the New York City-based Council on Foreign Relations think tank, offered a different perspective in an article late last year.

He argued that the share of U.S. dollars in China's reserves has been stable since 2015. He cited evidence suggesting the the dollar share in China's reserves had since 2015 been generally stable.

"If a simple adjustment is made for Treasuries held by offshore custodians like Belgium's (financial service provider) Euroclear, China's reported holdings of U.S. assets look to be basically stable at between $1.8 and $1.9 trillion," Setser wrote.

China's accumulation of raw materials extends to crude oil, where it remains the largest importer. In 2023, the country bought a record 11.3 million barrels per day, a 10 percent increase from 2022, driven by a surge in fuel demand after lifting pandemic restrictions.

Some economists have speculated that China's commodity buying spree could signal a strategic weakening of its currency, the yuan. Devaluation could make Chinese exports cheaper and more competitive globally, appealing to China's leadership amid a manufacturing surplus and low consumer confidence.

However, such a move carries with it significant risks, including higher import costs, increased inflation, potential instability in global currency markets, and the risk of trade wars as countries face an influx of cheaper Chinese goods. Economists thus refer to this as a "nuclear option."

Newsweek reached out to China's foreign ministry with a written request for comment.

[Derby]

https://www.ft.com/content/b6bb50b9-4f4e-4acb-ad5f-90d5ac3beaa5

How long can the good times keep rolling in markets?

We should at least be alive to the risks of a reckoning

Now that US interest rates seem to have stabilised, there are supposedly way too many deals being cooked up for bankers to take a summer break. As the Financial Times has reported, the joke around Wall Street these days is that August in the tony enclave of the Hamptons on Long Island has been cancelled. “There’s money everywhere,” the co-founder of one alternative asset manager was quoted as saying at this month’s Milken Institute conference.

The Hamptons quip is probably an exaggeration. But it’s certainly fair to say some green shoots are sprouting in the capital markets, at least in the bellwether investment banking products.

For instance, first-quarter M&A deal values in the US and in Europe harked back to the dealmaking enthusiasm of the pandemic years, according to Linklaters. In the US, the value of public M&A deals topped $224.3bn, the highest value of deals since the second quarter of 2022, when the deal values were $260bn. In Europe, deal values reached $47bn in the first quarter — also the highest since the second quarter of 2022 — driven by an increase in dealmaking in the UK.

According to S&P Global, global bond issuance in the first quarter of 2024 increased by 15 per cent, to $2.4tn, from $2tn in the first quarter of 2023. And last week, there was a rush of new issuance in both the investment-grade and high-yield bond markets.

One not so bright spot — initial public offerings. IPO issuance in the first quarter 2024 continued to decline, according to S&P Global, to the lowest level since the second quarter of 2022. But April was the busiest month for IPOs since November 2021, according to Renaissance Capital, which also tracks IPO issuance.

So good times it seems. But all of this raises a question. We are seeing a turn downwards in the interest rate cycle but without the usual painful economic correction that can accompany such pivots. Are we overdue a reckoning? The stock market might be one place to look for signs that things are getting out of hand after the more than doubling of the benchmark S&P 500 from pandemic lows in 2020.

David Einhorn, the reclusive hedge fund manager at Greenlight Capital who correctly predicted the implosion of Lehman Brothers in 2008, is pretty clear that things are not all right. “The stock market is fundamentally broken!” Greenlight declared in its first-quarter letter to his investors. Einhorn’s beef with the equity markets, as the letter outlined, seems to be that investors either don’t “care about valuation” or cannot “figure out valuation”.

He believes that old-fashioned value investing, where investors find stocks that are fundamentally undervalued and hold them until other investors figure out what they have been missing, is all but dead. He thinks index funds are ruling the markets and making the mistake of overinvesting in overvalued stocks and underinvesting in undervalued stocks.

“As several trillion dollars have been redeployed in this fashion in recent years, it has fundamentally broken the market,” according to the Greenlight letter. The firm claims not to be complaining. Rather, it says, it is “excited” to invest at this moment because “once these undervalued stocks underperform long enough, some of them become ridiculously cheap”.

Einhorn might not have had a great 2024 so far. His hedge fund returned 4.9 per cent in the first
quarter of 2024 compared with a rise of 10.6 per cent for the S&P 500. But that came after an impressive 2022 and 2023, during which Greenlight made returns of almost 33 per cent and 22 per cent, respectively.

It’s hard to know which camp is right — the Wall Street banking optimists, who get paid to be upbeat, or Einhorn, who has made a fortune on occasion by being pessimistic. But there are substantive issues overhanging markets — the many ongoing global conflicts, the continued uncertainty around the Federal Reserve’s direction of interest rates, and the outcome of the November US presidential election, which could very well return Donald Trump to the White House.

It seems to me we should at least be alive to the risks of a reckoning. Tiff Macklem, the governor of the Bank of Canada, has argued likewise, warning on May 9 that “some indicators of financial stress have risen” and that the valuation of “some financial assets appear to have become stretched”.

“This increases the risk of a sharp correction that could generate system-wide stress,” he said. “What’s most important is that to properly manage risks, financial system participants need to remain proactive. And financial authorities need to remain vigilant.”