www.transicionestructural.NET es un nuevo foro, que a partir del 25/06/2012 se ha separado de su homónimo .COM. No se compartirán nuevos mensajes o usuarios a partir de dicho día.
0 Usuarios y 1 Visitante están viendo este tema.
Y dicen que no pueden parar la producción de coches que jamás se van a vender por la cantidad de puestos de trabajo que se perderían, y tampoco los pueden rebajar a unos 2000-3000€/unidad (en cuyo caso sí que los venderían), porque entonces romperían el mercado...
? Además tengo entendido que casi todas las fábricas producen según pedido desde hace tiempo. .
Russia Leaks on 911 – Oops! Didn’t Think of That One! Posted on May 25, 2014 by Martin Armstrong Russia is starting to fight back with leaking the evidence that the USA has worked with terrorists and knew about 911 if not help the terrorists organize the attack. The Saudi’s have controlled the terrorists and threatened Russia that their Olympic Games would be safe only if they agreed to the Saudi terms. It was the very terrorists being armed by the USA to take down the Syrian government. The Saudi connection and the USA was exposed with the Syria attempted invasion.I reported that on the Benghazi Connection. The reliable story I got from behind the curtain was that John Christopher Stevens was supplying arms to the Syrian Rebels – terrorists we hated so much. That is why he was killed and the US had to step back and cover that up because the truth would expose the terrorist connection and how they used them for political purposes. I have stated all along there was an admixture here for it did not make sense.I even reported that the two World Trade Center Attacks were curiously about 8.6 years apart. Not sure if that is significant but it does seem to fit the government cycle. The timing itself is very curious. It even took place precisely on the day of Pi from the peak of the 8.6 year wave at that time. It seems even conspiracies are on time.I have stated that the coincidence with WTC7 collapse was a wipe out of evidence. That is where they took our computer system and when I asked for my legal discovery, the SEC responded that everything was destroyed in 911. That includes the evidence against all the bank manipulations that are now just starting to be exposed. No government employees in that WTC7 building were in there. They were evacuated.I have stated I was there and felt the building shake when it was first hit before the collapse. I was several blocks away at that time. That was more like an explosion than just a collision. I have stated that I know for an absolute fact that the first World Trade Center bombers drew the twin towers on the wall of their cell with planes flying into them one year before. Does that mean it was purely a terrorist attack? No. Because that does not explain WTC7. There are no coincidences in the middle of such events.I know the evidence they took from our offices. If there was a REAL prosecution in NYC, that would have led to the closure of the top five banks just as Solomon Brothers’ was rescued by part of the crew – Warren Buffet.Were there really planes? Yes there were. Those claiming there were no planes are plants to turn this into a conspiracy theory so the media will never touch it. The bottom line is simple. There was a real terrorist attack that the US KNEW ABOUT. They used it to cover up the Pentagon missing money and what else was there in WTC7 beyond what we had that would have ended the market manipulations back in 1999.Those who exaggerate this event PREVENT the public from listening. I cannot believe they are that stupid. These conspiracy-buffs have to be exaggerating this into purely a US plot with no planes for a reason. The Feds usurped the terrorists, perhaps helped them, that is enough. You do not have to go to extremes and say there were no planes for then you discredit the whole thing.There is already evidence that this is how government functions all the time. They point to the rich, but then hunt wires of $3,000. The multinational companies can keep their money offshore, but individuals cannot. This is the real world. It is all about money and retaining power. We do not need private groups. The real culprits are right before your eyes with the guns and tanks. Why invent undefined secret private groups behind the scenes who pull their strings. He who has the tanks makes the rules.History always argues against these conspiracy theories. It has ALWAYS been government without a single exception throughout all of history. Never has some private group overpowered government. It is always government – look no further. Even if there was some private group, if they are that powerful, there is NOTHING someone could do so do not vote and let the real culprits retain power. That seems to be the purpose of creating sinister shadow groups to protect government and those who run it inside. Sorry – I just do not trust anyone who advocates such extremes for they could be doing so for money.
These conspiracy-buffs can say I am wrong and there really are these dark sinister groups who want to dominate the world. They have NOTHING but speculation to support their claims. I was there. I have had a front row seat and fought against this trend all along. There is ABSOLUTELY NO such dark sinister force with long-term goals. This has ALWAYS been show me the money – NOW! NOT 25 years from now.Why these conspiracy-buffs insist I am wrong with ZERO experience is beyond me. The bankers moved from one manipulation to the next. They could care less what the instrument even was at that time. It was all about being profitable every year. That’s it – not 50 years down the road. I remain skeptical of those who say I am wrong and point to undefined groups with grand designs. This has allowed the bankers to operate in plain view for I believe they were the very source of those conspiracy theories.Whenever there was a strange coincidence, there was reason to look deeper. The Justice Department refused to investigate Cohen and Schiavoni. But that is nothing knew. Elliot Spitzer removed Hank Greenberg from AIG, who rejected insuring Goldman Sachs’ mortgage backed securities. That is FACT. Once Greenberg was removed, AIG began insuring Goldman’s paper. As soon as Spitzer thought he was king of the mountain and could control Wall Street, suddenly he was forced to resign over the hooker. This is way-too coincidental. I believe that Spitzer was fed information by Goldman Sachs to get rid of Hank Greeberg and then someone used the hooker when Spitzer looked to see who was next.Then there was the fake charges against Strauss-Kahn who was the head of the IMF between 2007 and 2011. Inside sources confirmed he was against and shocked at the internal corruption at the IMF. A deal was cut to replace him with another French candidate – guess who – Christine Lagarde. Strauss-Kahn was French. The candidate had to be French to get Nicolas Sarkozy’s support for the switch. The maid lied about the rape by Strauss-Kahn but that did not matter – he had to go. It was a set-up from the start. Politicians protect politicians in such matters. Strauss-Kahn was immediately abandoned BEFORE the fake charges would be exposed. Where was this scheme carried out? No other place than the real cesspool of political corruption – New York, New York. Obama’s personal friend was installed on his recommendation BEFORE there was even a vote. Christine Lagarde (born 1956) took office 5th of July 2011 and immediately put out studies to justify 80% taxation and Obama’s agenda.Scandals, both fake and real, are routinely used to get rid of people that do not cooperate. That applies to the bankers (Spitzer) as well as the socialists in government (Strauss-Kahn). This is how the real conspiracies function. It is immediate – not 50 years down the road.There was a deliberate takeover of government by the bankers to protect their methods of trading against clients. The bankers could do as they like free of prosecution and ensured they would always be bailed out. They still own the SEC and CFTC for people take jobs there to favor the big firms in hope of landing a million dollar job. They call this the revolving door in US regulators. Goldman stuffed Robert Rubin and Hank Paulson into the US Treasury to get rid of Glass Steagall and more.The bankers seized control of the Treasury and then used that position to lobby creating the ability to sell their toxic debt derivatives to European banks. The memo is floating around the Web dated November 24, 1997. I can confirm this was the strategy since at the time I even owned a brokerage house I was asked to bailout originally owned by the French bank. I am fully aware of that change back in 1995 that was maneuvered through the WTO at the time. This memo was merely allowing derivatives to be sold around the world exported from NYC. That was phase II after getting rid of Glass Steagall. This is how things were really done. There are no grand schemes. It is all about the money here and now – to hell with the future.
Plausible Denial aka The Cancer Of LeadershipSubmitted by Mark St.Cyr,No matter the headline, no matter the scandal, no matter how few or how many might be involved, one thing will become crystal clear: nobody that should have known – will have known.There was a time when this art form of creating circumstances as to protect people of influence had its place and was used sparingly and tactfully. However, as of today both the frequency along with how and where it is used has gone from “useful ruse” to a downright childish alibi. No one seems to be accountable today. And I mean nobody!The phrase plausible denial used to be a generic term with meaning given almost exclusively to the president for matters of state where an offer or position in a cabinet (or other such actions) if turned down by the recipient wouldn’t (or couldn’t) be used by the press as some bludgeoning tool where headlines might read: “Mr. or Mrs. Hornblower tells president to take the offer and stuff it.” This same inspired headline could be (or would be) used when difficult negotiations were taking place between foreign leaders. No one begrudged such use.The plausible denial ruse is and continues to be an important tool. There is a time and a place for such a thing and sometimes it is the most prudent depending on circumstances. Yet, what we are currently witnessing is a far cry from what we’ve known before. Now everyone is using it. So much so it might be time to ask if this once tried and true tactic has “jumped the shark?”Currently there seems to be numerous scandals (whether one agrees or disagrees) involving the political class. No matter the press conference, hearing rooms, and more, one thing has become apparent: No one knows anything, and no one was aware such problems existed. Even if they were directly responsible for the organization.Anything and everything that may have transpired dubious in nature happened without their knowledge even though many of these same people were hired exclusively to fix said problems. Absolutely amazing.This phenom is not something exclusive to the political class. No, no, far from it. This also permeates through our corporate culture where CEO’s and more seemingly have no clue that potentially illegal or at the least improper actions are taking place within their own corporate structure.We watch, hear, or read CEO’s of banks take to the media to express outrage when it’s pointed out that their highly profitable (for some most) department or subsidiary is found to have been “cooking the books” or engaging in highly immoral or in complete disregard of fiduciary responsibilities.Suddenly they are shocked. Shocked! That such could be taking place under their tutelage. A commanding statement is formulated that heads will roll. Yet, the only thing that seems to roll is what we all know rolls down hill. It never seems to be their fault even though that profit entry on the balance sheet was probably heralded on every conference call as to show why they deserve the millions upon millions of dollars in compensation.I find it ironic how so many so-called “brilliant” CEO’s had no knowledge how these once “profit centers” were raking in that profit. Because now those very same “profits” are costing share holders Billions upon Billions of dollars for legal fines and penalties. Nobody at the C level cared to ask “How in the world are we able to be making this amount of money?”Nope, they didn’t want to know it seems. And in days gone by that would be seen as a dereliction of duty by any C level executive worth their salt and worthy of dismissal. Today? It seems to be a badge of honor. i.e., They showed if a scandal breaks their fingers will be nowhere near it. That deserves a raise in compensation for if there’s one thing we want in out bankers is to show not only financial brilliance, but brilliance in skullduggery to boot!Again this isn’t an isolated indecent to just a few sectors. It’s happening across nearly everything and everyone we come in contact with.Companies farm out their production to countries where it is obvious to any business person that something is awry with how they can make a product so much cheaper than someone else. Forced labor, child labor, environmental disregards, illegal use of unsafe chemicals (just to name a few) are many times the underlying reasons why something can be produced so much cheaper. Yet, as long as they don’t ask – they didn’t know.We’ll only know if someone gets sick, hurt, or worse – dies. Then we can go back to: “They didn’t know, but now since we do, they’ll change it.”When something is known to cost $1.00 to produce even within competitive labor environments such as Asia. When someone states they can do it for not just less, but let’s say: a nickel. It has to set off bells all the way up the chain.Those bells should be seen for what any business person worth their salt instinctively recognizes them as: Alarm bells! Not bells signalling an all clear to raid the compensation pool.Leadership is not something left to what many deem as the “elites” of society. No, leadership is something that starts with us and ends with all of us. For one must remember the person at the top is only a person. And how that person conducts themself and takes ownership of their decisions and/or actions is no different from you or me. The only difference is the size of the stage.Just imagine where we would be if the people responsible for giving and carrying out the orders to storm the beaches at Normandy played by the so-called accepted rules or premises shown by a great many today.http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-05-24/plausible-denial-aka-cancer-leadership
La peligrosa decadencia del ImperioAndrés PiquerasProfesor de Sociología Universitat Jaume I de CastellónA cien años de la Primer Gran Guerra podemos estar asistiendo al principio del fin de la hegemonía estadounidense. De los dos pilares en los que todavía se sustenta ésta, el dólar (o el mundo financiero en general) y el complejo industrial-militar, el primero está en franco desmoronamiento; lo que previsiblemente minará a su vez al segundo.La continua creación de dinero sin respaldo (dólares-chatarra) por parte de la Reserva Federal de EEUU, no es sino una desesperada huida hacia adelante para no reconocer el colapso económico de la hasta ahora principal potencia mundial.La sustitución del dólar como moneda de referencia internacional, por alguna moneda “materializada”, referida a los recursos energéticos, está cada vez más próxima. Eso quiere decir que los países con reservas energéticas adquirirán un creciente peso si logran preservarlas para sí mismos.Pero mientras que las potencias geoestratégicas emergentes no buscan provocar abiertamente el derrumbe del dólar, pues le necesitan al menos mientras no se hayan desacoplado totalmente de él, EEUU está emprendiendo una ofensiva desesperada para mantener artificialmente el dólar como moneda refugio e intercambio internacional. Uno de sus puntos de anclaje para ello es crear inseguridad en torno a los recursos energéticos y especialmente el petróleo. Esto es así porque al pagarse el petróleo en dólares, si hay una crisis petrolera subirá el precio del “oro negro” y con ello la demanda de dólares, permitiendo la revalorización del papel verde.El otro punto radica en generar inestabilidad político-militar para hacer ver que sólo la moneda del más fuerte puede tener alguna seguridad. Por último, pero unido a esto, EEUU trata por todos los medios (y digo todos) de desbaratar la potencialidad de Eurasia. Eurasia es el Heartland (“la Isla del Centro del Mundo” en el vaticinio del primer estratega norteamericano, Mackinder), donde está la gran masa de población, recursos y riqueza.Algunos de los elementos geoestratégicos más importantes de la intervención del imperio en declive son:1. Acoso sistemático a Rusia. No contento con acabar con la URSS, persigue ahora desmembrar también Rusia, tratando de reducirla a un tamaño insignificante y sobre todo intentando separarla de sus territorios asiáticos y descolgar de ella Siberia, donde se alberga la mayor variedad de recursos del planeta. Chechenia, Georgia y algunos otros han venido siendo puntos calientes al respecto. Pero últimamente ha combinado esta política con intervenciones geoestratégicas de mayor calado, golpeando a Rusia a través de: a) la crisis bancaria de Chipre (allí es donde Rusia transformaba las cuentas de su energía en monedas de cambio para las compras internacionales); b) la guerra de Siria (cortando la salida de los oleoductos rusos al Mediterráneo e intentando a la vez establecer una cabeza de puente para el control de todo Asia Occidental y Central); c) el golpe de Estado en Ucrania (convierte al que se había pactado como un Estado tampón entre las potencias europeo-norteamericanas y Rusia en un Estado hostil a este último país, en sus propias puertas; al tiempo que intentaba privar a Rusia de la estratégica Crimea).2. Asedio a China a través de una permanente penetración en Asia Occidental y Centro-Asia, la implantación de un reguero de bases militares en las antiguas repúblicas soviéticas asiáticas, la desestabilización del flanco más oriental a través de las continuas provocaciones a Corea del Norte, el bloqueo del mar de Malaca (principal vía de los intercambios chinos) y el intento de desmembración del territorio chino por el lado del Tíbet, son sólo algunos de los eslabones estratégicos de aquel asedio.3. Lucha sin cuartel en África contra la penetración china en este continente, previo desplazamiento de Francia del mismo, y apropiación de todo lo que es apropiable allí (Libia, Congo, República Centroafricana, Mali y ahora Nigeria, son algunos de los puntos calientes en un incendio de guerras provocadas que asolan sin piedad el continente).Tanto en Asia como en África las intervenciones imperiales dejan atrás sociedades barbarizadas y en guerra entre sí, regiones enteras en manos de “señores de la guerra”, a menudo con un notorio ascenso de la influencia de Al-Qaeda (que luego justifiquen nuevas intervenciones militares en una espiral sin fin). También dejan Estados carcelarios, como Egipto, Yemen o Irak, que se vienen a sumar en ello a Israel.4. Contra-ataque en su “patio trasero” para anegar los procesos tanto progresistas como bolivarianos en América Latina (véase especialmente el presente acoso a Venezuela, donde la superpotencia se juega las posibles mayores reservas petroleras del mundo y un “peligroso” liderazgo contra-hegemónico). Ya ha tenido éxito en los golpes de Estado de Honduras y Paraguay.¿Mientras tanto qué le depara a Europa?Al viejo continente le tiene envuelto en otra dinámica belicista de “Guerra Fría” contra Rusia, precisamente cuando la vinculación a este país sería la única vía de salida futura inteligente para Europa desde un elemental sentido común capitalista (allí está la energía, la defensa nuclear, enormes recursos y mercado potencial que se abre también hacia el resto de Asia, por ejemplo).Además de otros objetivos ya vistos, a través de la creación de la crisis de Ucrania EEUU logra dar dos pasos a la vez. Uno: meter el miedo a los europeos de un probable corte de suministros energéticos por parte de Moscú, llevándoles a refugiarse en el espejismo energético del fracking estadounidense. Y dos: dar cobertura para que su complejo industrial-militar pueda intentar tirar de nuevo de la economía.Al mismo tiempo la superpotencia americana busca la implantación de un macro acuerdo de “libre comercio” (TTIP) con Europa. Con esto pretende dar una salida a sus productos hacia Europa ante un mercado interno crecientemente insolvente. Para ello necesita que los europeos desbaraten la legislación protectora de sus economías y rebajen o eliminen los controles de calidad de las mercancías y las regulaciones sobre transgénicos y demás prevenciones respecto de la salud pública. Aún más importante, busca preservar al dólar como moneda de intercambio con Europa y evitar que ésta forme bloque con los BRICS y muy especialmente con Rusia.Curiosamente, una vez doblegados los principales líderes europeos bajo tremendas presiones (con algún sui generis “golpe de Estado” por medio, como el de Renzi), el último reducto de resistencia ante toda esta tropelía que se lleva a cabo, como es habitual con el mayor secretismo, no son las poblaciones europeas, que no saben de la misa la media al respecto; ni siquiera las principales fuerzas sindicales, al parecer ocupadas en no perder legitimidad frente a la Troika. Ese último reducto parece encarnarlo la clase capitalista alemana. Demasiado consciente de lo que se juega dando la espalda a la parte rica del continente que llamamos Eurasia.Al margen de los resultados de las recientes elecciones que en gran medida son ajenas a todo ello, es extremadamente urgente para los pueblos europeos reaccionar contra las dinámicas de guerra y nuevo auge del fascismo que cien años después sacuden de nuevo sus tierras.http://blogs.publico.es/dominiopublico/10060/la-peligrosa-decadencia-del-imperio/