www.transicionestructural.NET es un nuevo foro, que a partir del 25/06/2012 se ha separado de su homónimo .COM. No se compartirán nuevos mensajes o usuarios a partir de dicho día.
0 Usuarios y 1 Visitante están viendo este tema.
Buen análisis:http://blogs.elconfidencial.com/mundo/las-tres-voces/2016-06-30/brexit-relato-nacional-casa-dividida_1225763/
@LemBagaje.Sds.
Brexit: Singapore bank UOB suspends London property loans 9 hours ago From the section Business Image copyright Getty ImagesImage caption Singapore's other big lenders said they were closely monitoring the situationOne of Singapore's largest lenders, UOB, says it has suspended its loan programme for London properties.The decision comes in response to uncertainty caused by the UK's decision to leave the EU, the bank said.The vote on 23 June caused global market turmoil and pushed the pound to 31-year lows. The Singapore dollar has gained about 10% since the referendum.Singaporeans were the top Asian buyers of UK commercial property in 2015, according to consultancy Knight Frank.UOB told the BBC in a statement: "We will temporarily stop receiving foreign property loan applications for London properties.""As the aftermath of the UK referendum is still unfolding and given the uncertainties, we need to ensure our customers are cautious with their London property investments."Analysis: Karishma Vaswani, Asia Business correspondentRead this as the bank telling Singapore borrowers - hold your horses chaps, you may be in for a bumpy ride.Market sources tell me that UOB has the highest exposure amongst the big three banks in Singapore to London property loans. UOB doesn't disclose how much it lends out for the London portfolio but it also offers international loans for Australia and Thailand."From a banking perspective, this [the possibility of Brexit] is just the tip of the iceberg," Sam Ahmed, Managing Director of Deriv Asia told me. "And banks will look to protect themselves from unintended consequences and adopt a more conservative approach by limiting their exposure for UK based assets."
Michael Gove: Boris Johnson wasn't up to the job 5 minutes ago From the section UK Politics Michael Gove has said he chose to run for the Conservative Party leadership after deciding "reluctantly but firmly" that Boris Johnson was not capable of uniting the party or the country."It had to fall to someone else... I felt it had to fall to me," he said.The justice secretary was set to back his fellow Leave campaigner. Mr Johnson pulled out after Mr Gove's switch.Home Secretary Theresa May, who backed staying in the EU, is favourite to win the contest and become prime minister.The other contenders are Work and Pensions Secretary Stephen Crabb, who backed Remain, ex-Defence Secretary Liam Fox, who backed leaving the EU and energy minister and Leave campaigner Andrew Leadsom.Nominations for the Conservative Party leadership closed at midday on Thursday.The winner of the contest - sparked by David Cameron's decision to resign after the UK voted to leave the EU - is set to be announced on 9 September.Mr Gove's decision to run for the leadership and Mr Johnson's subsequent decision to bow out of the contest sent shockwaves through the political world in a day of high drama on Thursday.In an interview with the BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg, Mr Gove, explaining his reasons for standing, said following last week's Brexit result he felt the country needed a leader "who believed heart and soul in leaving the European Union"."I also believed we needed someone who would be able to build a team, lead and unite. I hoped that person would be Boris Johnson," he said.But he added: "I came in the last few days reluctantly and firmly to the conclusion that while Boris has great attributes he was not capable of uniting that team and leading the party and the country in the way that I would have hoped."Mr Gove said he had only decided to run for the leadership late on Wednesday evening, and was still to speak to Mr Johnson about his decision.He rejected as "just not true" accusations from Mr Johnson's supporters that he had betrayed the former London mayor by deciding to stand for leader, rather than throw his weight behind him.He said he had been "trying hard to persuade" Conservative MPs over the course of the week that Mr Johnson was the right candidate to be leader but after reflecting on conversations with colleagues "I realised it was not going to work"."So I tried as hard as I could but last night, reflecting on this, I came to the conclusion that ultimately Boris could not build that team, could not provide that leadership and that unity."It had to fall to someone else. As someone who had argued consistently that we should leave the European Union, and as someone who's experienced at the highest levels in the Cabinet, I felt it had to fall to me," he said.Image copyright PAImage caption Mr Gove and Mr Johnson campaigned side by side during the referendum campaignMr Gove - who along with Mr Johnson was a prominent figure in the Leave campaign - also confirmed he had not discussed his decision with Chancellor George Osborne.Echoing arguments he made during the EU referendum campaign, he said he would work to bring down immigration outside the EU to a "manageable" level, built on an Australian points-style system."I'll negotiate with toughness, and with great attention to detail to get the best possible deal for Britain. It's only when we are outside the European Union that we can at last bring those numbers under control in the way that the public want," he said.Setting out his Brexit plan, Mr Gove said he would not trigger Article 50 - the formal process for leaving the EU - until he was ready to do so."The decision to trigger Article 50 is in the hands of the next prime minister. If that is me, I will make a judgement as to when is right for Britain and I won't be hurried or hassled by anyone into pressing that button or triggering that Article until I believe it is right for this country," he said.
Pero lo que pueden ganar un señor de Oporto, Bratislava o Vigo con una ruptura desordenada de todas las instituciones y tratados edificadasa a lo largo de medio siglo, no alcanzo a imaginarlo.
Ya. Si esto es el trilema De Rodrik: globalización, Soberanía y democracia no se pueden tener a la vez pero sí las parejas posibles con esos tres elementos. China va sacrificado la democracia y en Europa y USA tocará sacrificar parcialmente la globalización . Pero de no ser globalista entusiasta a soñar con cosas tan absurdas como cierre de fronteras al nivel de la España de 1970 y florecientes minas de carbón en EL Bierzo con productividades de 1Tm por minero y día , va un trecho .
¿Por qué tanto rechazo al libre comercio?
Cita de: Republik en Junio 30, 2016, 22:11:27 pmYa. Si esto es el trilema De Rodrik: globalización, Soberanía y democracia no se pueden tener a la vez pero sí las parejas posibles con esos tres elementos. China va sacrificado la democracia y en Europa y USA tocará sacrificar parcialmente la globalización . Pero de no ser globalista entusiasta a soñar con cosas tan absurdas como cierre de fronteras al nivel de la España de 1970 y florecientes minas de carbón en EL Bierzo con productividades de 1Tm por minero y día , va un trecho .¿Podrías explicar más eso? Ya había oído sobre el trilema. Lo que nunca me ha quedado claro es si se trata de una especie de "teorema social", o si meramente es que ninguna nación ha sido capaz hasta ahora de tener las tres cosas a la vez.Entiendo que la elección de la UE y de USA ha sido sacrificar parcialmente la soberanía y parcialmente la democracia para tener algo de las tres, pero como más importante la globalización.Lo que veo ridículo es tratar de volver a las políticas mercantilistas de "empobrecer al vecino" (y empobreciendo a la mayor parte de su población también, aunque éso sí, igualando socialmente por abajo a casi todos), políticas cutres a más no poder y que además no hacen sino aumentar casi instantáneamente los recelos entre naciones aún vecinas.
Irregularidades obligan a anular las elecciones austríacas donde el ecologista Van der Bellen se impuso por la mínima al ultraderechista Hofer:http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2016/07/01/actualidad/1467367627_691181.html
Cita de: pobrecitohablador en Junio 30, 2016, 20:30:30 pm¿Por qué tanto rechazo al libre comercio?Es puro tierraplanismo.Los lumpendemócratas creen que pueden exigir un salario elevado y a la vez seguir comprando pantalones a 3 euros en el Primark, en la ignorante ilusión de que ambos hechos no están relacionados entre sí Lo que pasa que aqui NADIE se dedica a fabrica ropa. Por eso no es visto como amenaza.Cambia "pantalones de 3€" por carbón (polaco), acero (chino), coches (bulgaria) u hortalizas (marruecos), y tendrás delante a un grupo de presión deseoso de revertir la globalización y poner trabas al comercio internacional en defensa de sus intereses.En la alimentación los agricultores españoles protestan contra Marruecos, y Francia protesta contra España.
¿Por qué tanto rechazo al libre comercio, que es algo que todos los economistas y políticos de todos los partidos apoyan?