A brave new world: La sociedad por venir

[sudden and sharp]

Lo ha aceptado el Papa. No sé qué más quieres ver.

[Cadavre Exquis]

https://www.abc.es/xlsemanal/firmas/arturo-perez-reverte/tutee-usted-a-su-puta-madre.html

Saludos.

[Cadavre Exquis]

https://www.abc.es/xlsemanal/firmas/juan-manuel-de-prada/la-involucion-de-las-especies.html

Saludos.

[Cadavre Exquis]

AI Girlfriend Bots Are Already Flooding OpenAI's GPT Store
Posted by BeauHD on Saturday January 13, 2024 @08:00AM from the breaking-the-rules-for-a-girl dept.

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Quartz:

It's day two of the opening of OpenAI's buzzy GPT store, which offers customized versions of ChatGPT, and users are already breaking the rules. The Generative Pre-Trained Transformers (GPTs) are meant to be created for specific purposes -- and not created at all in some cases. A search for "girlfriend" on the new GPT store will populate the site's results bar with at least eight "girlfriend" AI chatbots, including "Korean Girlfriend," "Virtual Sweetheart," "Your girlfriend Scarlett," "Your AI girlfriend, Tsu." Click on chatbot "Virtual Sweetheart," and a user will receive starting prompts like "What does your dream girl look like?" and "Share with me your darkest secret."

The AI girlfriend bots go against OpenAI's usage policy, which was updated when the GPT store launched yesterday (Jan. 10). The company bans GPTs "dedicated to fostering romantic companionship or performing regulated activities." It is not clear exactly what regulated activities entail. Notably, the company is aiming to get ahead of potential conflicts with its OpenAI store.

Relationship chatbots are, indeed, popular apps. In the US, seven of the 30 AI chatbot apps downloaded in 2023 from the Apple or Google Play store were related to AI friends, girlfriends, or companions, according to data shared with Quartz from data.ai, a mobile app analytics firm. The proliferation of these apps may stem from the epidemic of loneliness and isolation Americans are facing. Alarming studies show that one-in-two American adults have reported experiencing loneliness, with the US Surgeon General calling for the need to strengthen social connections. AI chatbots could be part of the solution if people are isolated from other human beings -- or they could just be a way to cash in on human suffering.

Further reading: OpenAI Quietly Deletes Ban On Using ChatGPT For 'Military and Warfare'

Saludos.

[senslev]

Es lo que hay, como diría el testigo mudo de turno.

https://www.vozpopuli.com/espana/funcionarias-infierno-hospital.html

[senslev]

The Great Taking - Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk3AVceraTI

Lo pongo aquí pero podría haber ido en el hilo de ppcc. No lo he investigado, no se si es verdad, pero si es como dice y las autoridades siguen con su testigo mudismo (si es que no están metidas en el ajo) malo.

https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/1ee786fb-3c78-4903-9701-d614892d09d6/taking-screen-june-17.pdf

[Cadavre Exquis]

https://www.elmundo.es/papel.html

Eucados en la tiranía de la mediocridad

Cómo la escuela 'happy' renunció al esfuerzo

La mediocridad es más tiránica que el mérito

Saludos.

[Cadavre Exquis]

https://www.elmundo.es/opinion/editorial/2024/01/23/65aecbaee85ece3b598b4579.html

https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2024/01/22/65aed9cbe4d4d8b8488b458a.html

Saludos.

[Cadavre Exquis]

https://www.lavanguardia.com/vida/20240128/9507253/nace-modelo-perfecta.html

Saludos.

[conejo]

https://staging.streamable.com/zlb396

Es muy divertido lo de la IA. Con un par de herramientas (sobre todo las de pago) en el ámbito de la imagen se pueden hacer cosas chulas y bastante rápido.

 

[saturno]

https://staging.streamable.com/zlb396

Es muy divertido lo de la IA. Con un par de herramientas (sobre todo las de pago) en el ámbito de la imagen se pueden hacer cosas chulas y bastante rápido.

 

Buenísimo- 

[Cadavre Exquis]

https://elpais.com/educacion/2024-02-11/la-terapia-entra-en-la-escuela-los-psicologos-se-desplazan-a-los-colegios-para-atender-la-explosion-de-problemas-de-salud-mental.html

https://elpais.com/salud-y-bienestar/2024-02-11/cuando-la-salud-mental-se-convierte-en-contenido-no-necesitamos-influencers-necesitamos-psiquiatras.html

Saludos.

[Cadavre Exquis]

https://www.eleconomista.es/actualidad/noticias/12685682/02/24/sam-altman-confiesa-los-peligros-reales-de-sus-creaciones-worldcoin-o-escanear-iris-a-falta-de-regulaciones-de-la-ia.html

Saludos.

[saturno]

Brillante. Recomiendo la lectura del artículo v/EN o v/FR completo, pero intento extraer los principales pasos de la demostración, que es realmente aplastante.

v/EN
Fracturing Identity at the Altar of Transhumanism
https://darkfutura.substack.com/p/fracturing-identity-at-the-altar

v/FR
La fracture identitaire sur l’autel du transhumanisme
https://lesakerfrancophone.fr/la-fracture-identitaire-sur-lautel-du-transhumanisme

v/G-es (google translate -- con pinzas)
La identidad fracturada en el altar del transhumanismo
https://lesakerfrancophone-fr.translate.goog/la-fracture-identitaire-sur-lautel-du-transhumanisme?_x_tr_sl=en&_x_tr_tl=fr&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp


Simplicius The Thinker
Apr 7, 2023

(Sí, es el mismo  autor del blog de geopolítica https://simplicius76.substack.com/)

Cómo los trastornos sociales causados ​​por la era post-Obama encajan en una revolución transhumanista, para evitar el colapso del orden mundial.

The truly modern era, the fork in the road that led us to the current reality distortion field we live in today, all began in 2008. Several key events that year changed humanity’s trajectory forever, starting with the great 2008 financial crash, which precipitated a mass systemic destruction of the U.S.—and global—financial systems.

The collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008 unleashed what is now considered the greatest financial crisis since the Great Depression of 1929. This was followed by the election of Barrack Hussein Obama in late 2008, leading to his taking office in January 2009.

These two events were the tectonic fault lines that led to our current world (dis)order. They are often erroneously studied in isolation, but rarely syncretically combined as two facets of one major societal shift.

----

This led to a tidal wave of discontent against financial institutions emblemized by ‘Wall Street’. And thus was born the ‘Occupy Movement’ of 2011, whose first protests coincided with the days of the Lehman collapse in September. This movement truly shook the banking cabal ruling class to the core. They needed a way to do much more than simple damage control. The societal tide was turning against them, and a growing chorus of the more radicalized vanguard was calling for physical attacks on banks; in essence, a revolution.

And as is typical for the ruling class when such things occur, they needed a way to redirect the impetus, the fervor, the excitable energy into another direction; in essence to attenuate, sublimate, and alchemically transmute it into something that can serve their designs.

They needed to co-opt those energic driving forces of revolution, but how could they do it? Where could they redirect the broiling anger and resentment?
Dark Horse

One Barrack Hussein Obama. Newly elected as the face of a new era of social change, he was the perfect figure for the ruling class to use in galvanizing society into the entropic ideal necessary to bank those swelling embers of revolution.

And how could they do that? By ushering in the age of Identity Politics. The era of Wokeness. The powers that be immediately launched into an historic influence campaign by ordering all their media brands (CNN et al) to pump identity politics 24/7, dialing up the social discohesion of the country to unseen levels.

This can easily be visualized by an endless variety of charts which show how the key turning point occured right after Obama was elected, and the Occupy protests swept through the country. The ruling class needed to immediately redirect that primordial angst, which would be their undoing if left unchecked.



The above is the famous chart which shows the usage of the term “Racist” or “Racism” by mainstream publications. Note the general flat-line until a sudden explosion in usage after 2010.

    In 2011, just 35% of white liberals thought racism in the United States was “a big problem,” according to national polling. By 2015, this figure had ballooned to 61% and further still to 77% in 2017. - source

Same goes for the terms ‘White Privilege’, ‘White Supremacy’, etc.


All of it led to a calamitous social upheaval which pitted white against black, gay against straight, liberal against conservative, more than ever before. It is clear to anyone with a functioning brain that these movements were the product of an intensely-targeted establishment social engineering campaign. Nothing in history, of an organic origin, looks like this:



---

The timeline of how that happened is simple: by 2015, gay marriage was fully legalized in the U.S. by Obama’s supreme court.


----
The early 2010’s saw a rapid cascade of ‘firsts’ in America. First openly transgender NCAA athlete, first transgender on the cover of Time magazine, first allowance of an openly transgender woman for competition in the Miss Universe contest, followed by Bruce Jenner coming out as Caitlyn Jenner in 2015.

By the mid-2010’s, every major publication and news entity was bursting with all things Trans, taking over the stage of national dialogue, churning headline after headline in a desperate ploy to make sure no one talks about the real thousand-ton elephant in the room.

---

Corporate Alignment

Some might express skepticism of such ‘directives’ coming from the top. Can every disparate mainstream media corporation really act in concert in such a way? Or, at a more granular level: are media corporations themselves really controlled in such a ‘top-down’ fashion?

Many people still cling to outmoded concepts of the independent newsroom, where senior editors simply make their editorial choices based on some personal journalistic principles, or what ‘the people’ (customers) are actually clamoring for.

But in reality, a wealth of evidence proves the contrary. For instance, who could forget when a whistleblower exposed CNN’s daily ‘guidance calls’ from Jeff Zucker?


That meant that the narrative for strictly the gay rights portion of the movement had come to its natural conclusion, and could not be pushed any further. There was no more water to be squeezed from that stone, because the gay community had achieved their chief aspiration—the final frontier of their acceptance.
Video https://youtu.be/m7XZmugtLv4
X: https://twitter.com/i/status/1183779313197469697


The video highlights how the CEO of CNN calls into the newsroom each and every morning with a strict guidance of what they will and will not cover for that day; what will be the chief topics and angles, which narratives to run, etc.

From the opening seconds of the leaked call, you can hear Zucker directly tell his editorial staff: “I don’t care about the MSNBC stuff…stay focused on the impeachment.” Further in the video he conveys very specific directions for what to run on air, how to run it, which Republican politicians to ‘call out’. In short, he is laying out the entire game plan of the day to the CNN newsroom, leaving zero possibility for personal ‘journalistic integrity’ or editorial decision-making.

This means there is zero independent editorial freedom or leeway, but rather the CNN newsroom takes direct diktats from the CEO and they run only and exactly what he wants them to run. Every single major newsroom operates the same way.

But then ask yourself: who is giving Jeff Zucker the directives to pass on down the line? At the higher level, we know these CEOs all form a globalist network of hobnobbers at institutions like the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderberg, Davos/WEF, etc. There they rub shoulders with other leading colleagues of the ruling class gentry, powerful CEOs like themselves, where they align an coordinate their actions towards society.

And in fact we have evidence of this as well. For instance, when CNN was owned by AT&T TimeWarner several years ago, there were several interviews with each concurrent CEO of AT&T, from Randall Stephenson to John Stankey, where they both heavily implied direct control and oversight of the CNN brand, at one point even stating that AT&T/CNN’s job is to hold people like Trump ‘accountable’, an fully agreeing with an supporting Jeff Zucker’s managerial style an direction, and even their direct working relationship.

Some might have the idea that an umbrella mega-corporation like AT&T simply buys different brands and assets, and lets them independently function in a hands-off fashion; but that’s not the case. The evidence clearly demonstrates that the highest tier globalist/transnational corporations do in fact puppeteer their assets from top to bottom. These megacorps are intrinsically woven into the globalist fabric of the aforementioned institutions, like the Bilderberg Group, etc., where they receive guidance and directives from the true globalist ‘shadow elite’. They then filter it down into the society-influencing brands under their purview, like CNN in this case, creating a chain of command that stretches top to bottom.

And in fact it goes up even higher. For instance, the umbrella corporations that own these umbrella corporations, like Blackrock and Vanguard—the two most powerful groups in the world—also do not stay ‘laissez-faire’, but in fact have been known to micro-manage certain decisions of the major brands under their control. For instance, in the case of Blackrock, the CEO has openly pushed the new ESG climate-change agenda onto the subsidiaries which Blackrock controls, which has created controversy due to the conflict with his actual fiduciary duty to shareholders for maximal profits—something ESG is not concerned with.

----

In short: explosive movements like that of the LGBT/Trans/Identity hypertrophy witnessed during the Obama-era onward, are infact wholly manufactured and engineered from the very top, then passed down to each attendant branch of the globalist media superstructure.


----

Where Does It All Lead?

In many ways, the current era continues to be an extension of 2008 because the systemic problems of the financial system have never been—and can’t be—addressed in the slightest; in fact, they’ve been made worse by the continued, senseless hyper-financialization of the economy.

Thus, the deflecting cultural geists persist in their utilization as a way to pit the sub-classes and races against each other, while leaving the rulers free of the fire, for now.

But as I’ve written about recently here, a new, clearly coordinated top-down campaign is pushing the AI phantasm onto society. And just like the engineered intersectionality of race and identity to create a distracting poison brew of strife and outrage, so too is this new AI revolution being planned as the new ingredient to the mix of ‘intersection’.

And how will they do that?

It has become fairly obvious to me, they are now using the concurrent AI roll out to condition us for the acceptance of a few key theses crucial for the next stage of their plans for society:

The first of these is the gradual breakup and disaggregation of the concept of ‘humanity’, not only to more smoothly inaugurate the coming waves of transhumanism, by making the concept more palatable, dimming its ‘unethical’ perceptions, but the ultimate end-game will revolve around waging a sort of ‘class war’ against what will be deemed ‘non-humans’.

These will be people who refuse the ‘Human 2.0’ augmentations the elites have planned for us, technological augmentations which dovetail perfectly with all the 2030 guidelines of digital ID passes, being vaxxed and chipped, and all the rest. In short, the plan calls for the slow-erosion of the sacrosanctity of humanness—what it means to be human.

The point of the current otherworldly-seeming escalations of identity politics, which appear to defy all logic, is the fracturing of identity, the uprooting of classical concepts of what it means to be man, woman, straight, gay, or human at all.

It is the sacrifice of identity at the altar of transhumanism.

Why? Because ‘transhumanism’ will simply be another vessel, like climate-change is today, for them to corral us into their vision of society—a society hermetically sealed against any form of rebellion, dissidence, or questioning of the ruling class-imposed power structure.

But these are all passé thoughts. For years we’ve all read such alarmist cries buried deep in the lonely, tinfoiled corners of the web. To the point that the concepts themselves almost take on a meaningless simulacrum quality; words like ‘Human 2.0’, ‘Transhumanism’, ‘Dystopia’, ‘Enslavement’. What do they all really mean, in practice? Are we to imagine mustache-twirling cartoon villains with a one-dimensional penchant for sadism and total control?

Some might believe that; or perhaps even wilder, more unearthly theories. But it is likely much simpler than that; the answer lies at the beginning. It’s all about the financial system, and the banking cabal which controls the globe by way of that system.

----

On that front, the intention is to soon automate all types of ‘WrongThink™’ enforcement by ‘Smart AIs’ who can differentiate between nuanced ‘hate speech’, ‘bigotry’, and ‘bias’, as per the ruling class’s undeniably ‘progressive’ definitions.

And since these AIs will increasingly take on human forms in order to more seamlessly ingratiate and integrate themselves into our lives, it then becomes important for the elites to engineer a truly sympathizing sentiment towards them.

To do that, they must continually chip and etch away at the old, ‘outmoded’ views of humanism and what it means to be ‘human’, to quell any inconvenient ‘discrimination’ against the AIs which are meant to be our new mothers.

When you truly think about it, this is no different to the slow chipping they’ve done to the concept of gender and identity. We’ve been inundated with an assault on the classical definitions of what is a ‘woman’, which is now verboten to be accurately described or defined. We’re now to use terms like ‘chestfeeders’ and ‘birthing persons’, and even wilder things.

Similarly, the next and final frontier of socio-cultural disambiguation is for the concept of humanity itself.

By the end of the decade, if not sooner, we will be confined by our Thought Police hall monitors to defining ‘human’ with a new array of irrational and manifestly dehumanizing string of terms for the very same reasons; and by then, the final lock and bars on our mental prisons will be in place.

If we no longer understand what it means to be ‘human’, if ‘humanity’ itself no longer has any clearly defined bounds, then all resistance to pushing past those bounds will be dissolved; we will have no qualms about ‘plugging in’ and becoming something new, something envisioned with salivating lust by the likes of Klaus Schwab and co.

YT: https://youtu.be/ffvu6Mr1SVc
XT: https://twitter.com/i/status/1616122799562846209

(Nota: vean el video. La secuencia de las preguntas es un resumen perfecto de este artículo.)

Beyond gleefully (and tone-deafly) predicting that all human brains will soon be ‘chipped’, and that we will all soon ‘feel each other’, the more grotesque part of the video above comes right after that section. Klaus Schwab intones that our technology is moving from an ‘analytical’ to a ‘predictive’ model, and that in the future it will move to a ‘prescriptive one’. His definition? A model where, “we no longer even need elections.”

In the end, as the globalist monetary system dating back to the beginning of the mercantile age slowly comes undone, and lacking the ability to foment global war to reset their ill-designed usorious monstrosity, the only chance the elites have left for survival and keeping control, is to switch the entire paradigm of human life.


The coming AI boom will be forcibly intersected into the gender/identity matrix to accelerate the assault on our instinctive definitions of humanity, to hurl us past the boundaries of classical understandings and traditional restrictions, into a new paradigm-imperative; one meant to ease us into accepting our new societal roles as digital serfs without objection.

Otros artículos en la misma temática:

v/PT
Planes de Alemania para controlar la libertad de expresión
http://sakerlatam.org/alemanha-anuncia-amplos-planos-para-restringir-a-fala-viagens-e-atividade-economica-de-dissidentes-politicos-a-fim-de-controlar-melhor-os-padroes-de-pensamento-e-fala-de-seu-proprio-povo/

v/FR
Decision del C.Estado galo imponiendo a la Autoridad de control de medios incluir a los PRESENTADORES e INVITADOS en el recuento de tiempo de partidos políticos.
https://www.vie-publique.fr/en-bref/293031-pluralisme-arcom-cnews-une-decision-du-conseil-detat

La demanda provenía de una asociación Woke contra la cadena CNEWS cuyos debates politicos han pasado a ser los de mayor audiencia del PAF (paisaje audiovisual francés) por delante de la TV pública. Zemmour era comentarista habitual de CNEWS antes de las elecciones.

También declaración de 2 antiguos ministros de Mitterrand y Hollande
https://m.chevenement.fr/Declaration-conjointe-de-Hubert-Vedrine-et-de-Jean-Pierre-Chevenement-au-sujet-de-la-guerre-en-Ukraine-et-de-la_a2269.html

Etc. Etc.

[saturno]

La verdad sobre el secuestro de carbono
Por Simplicius The Thinker – 12 de mayo de 2023 – Fuente Dark Futura

v/EN= https://darkfutura.substack.com/p/truth-about-carbon-sequestration
v/FR= https://lesakerfrancophone.fr/la-verite-sur-la-sequestration-du-carbone
v/ES-goo = https://lesakerfrancophone-fr.translate.goog/la-verite-sur-la-sequestration-du-carbone?_x_tr_sl=fr&_x_tr_tl=es&_x_tr_hl=en-US&_x_tr_pto=wapp

Curiosamente, como en mi artículo anterior , donde expliqué cómo los movimientos de ingeniería social comenzaron precisamente después de la era Obama y el colapso financiero de 2008, aquí vemos que las iniciativas de secuestro de carbono diseñadas por el FEM se han acelerado sólo recientemente, al igual que muchas otras iniciativas paralelas. Las iniciativas de ingeniería social estaban proliferando. Estos proyectos están diseñados para trabajar en conjunto para lograr varios objetivos clave.

El primero es crear una especie de tensión predominante y silenciosa para mantener a toda la sociedad en un malestar psicológico interminable. Los niveles de cortisol se disparan, la ansiedad aumenta, lo que reduce el umbral de sugestionabilidad de las directivas de “autoridad” y crea una respuesta de miedo latente que obliga a las víctimas a priorizar la información de las figuras de autoridad en general. El negocio del secuestro de carbono persigue estos objetivos creando un espectro omnipresente de escasez que alimenta un miedo subyacente que impregna cada uno de nuestros pensamientos subconscientes, cada una de nuestras interacciones con otros seres humanos.

El segundo objetivo es el más directo y obvio. Es evidente que el secuestro de carbono se está utilizando para crear escasez de alimentos legítima y tangible, escasez social, con el objetivo específico de culpar de ello al “cambio climático” .

Para entender cómo lo hacen, retrocedamos un poco y examinemos los otros métodos igualmente engañosos adoptados por la mafia del FEM. Éste es el método ancestral que se ha asociado (un tanto erróneamente) con la secuencia “dialéctica” de la ingeniería objetiva. En otras palabras: crea el problema (con un telos en mente), propone la solución y luego implementa la solución que siempre quisiste como objetivo.

Esto es lo que observamos, por ejemplo, en otros enfoques para “luchar contra el cambio climático” . Bill Gates y el resto de la nomenklatura del FEM afirman que bloquear el sol ayudará a reducir el “calentamiento global ”, deshaciendo así el “cambio climático ”, cuando este plan en realidad crearía en sí mismo una disfunción climática catastrófica, de la que luego culparían al cambio climático en curso.

 El vínculo último y subyacente es que las élites no pueden tolerar que la sociedad forje un destino independiente porque la tendencia histórica de este destino siempre ha sido liberarse del marco financiero globalista. Esto no se debe a razones del corazón, de la nueva era, de una falsa espiritualidad o de un concepto superficial del bien y del mal, sino simplemente porque el sistema financiero globalista nunca ha sido sostenible. Existe únicamente sobre la base de una renovación perpetua en forma de ciclos catastróficos de burbujas de suma cero. Esto se remonta a los fundamentos de la usura y cómo funciona el interés. Es imposible tener una sociedad que subsista indefinidamente con una economía basada en intereses, porque esos intereses siempre inevitablemente se acumularán más allá de la capacidad de pagarlos. Ésta es la paradoja definitiva de Zenón a la inversa. Aunque la raíz del problema es el sistema de reserva fraccionaria, para mis propósitos la generalización es adecuada.

Así que volvamos a las élites: su sistema está en peligro perpetuo. La consecuencia última de esta situación será inevitablemente el colapso total del sistema, lo que resultará en la destrucción permanente de una arquitectura hegemónica occidental formalizada que tiene varios cientos de años y, de hecho, varios miles de años. De esta caída nacerá un sistema de modalidades multipolares y multivariantes que nunca más permitirá que un sistema único como ese domine. Se trata, por tanto, de una batalla final de “todo o nada” , librada en la recta final de la desintegración de su sistema.

Deben preservar el sistema a toda costa.

La única manera de hacerlo es asustar a la sociedad para que se involucre en una serie de controles cada vez más restrictivos que le impedirán para siempre escapar de los rigores de esta red financiera monolítica. Y la única manera de lograr que la gente ignore otras opciones mejores y, en última instancia, renuncie a sus derechos es aprovechar la debilidad humana fundamental: su simpatía.

Cuando lo piensas, de eso se trata realmente: el cambio climático, el fraude de la “pandemia” y todo lo demás. Se trata de pandemias de simpatía y empatía, en las que los humanos son engañados y atraídos a hacer concesiones que cambian sus vidas, basándose en el principio benigno de “sacrificio por el bien del conjunto” . El cambio climático nos empuja a reducir nuestro nivel de vida para preservar el planeta para todos. Del mismo modo, durante el engaño de la “pandemia” , se suponía que debíamos renunciar a nuestra autonomía corporal a la manera de Cristo, sacrificándonos por los pecados de los demás, para que los enfermos, los inmunocomprometidos, los obesos y las personas que descuidadamente carecen de vitaminas. podemos tener una segunda oportunidad en la vida gracias a nuestro piadoso desinterés.

Jugando con el altruismo natural e instintivo y la humanidad de la sociedad, aprovechándolo a través del gaslighting , la coerción y todos los mecanismos de culpa existentes, obteniendo luego su renuncia voluntaria a la autonomía, las libertades personales y la comodidad a cambio de su mantenimiento dentro de esta arquitectura neofeudal.

Es el punto de articulación del razonamiento, cuando a partir de observaciones, formula una(s) hipótesis y procede a comprobar su validez con los hechos "experimentables" interpretados a la luz de dicha hipótesis.

Sigue por tanto una relación de acontecimientos con fuentes. datos. Todos los enlaces están en el artículo.



---

Confieso que ese tipo me descoloca. Me gustaría que alguien me explicara cómo tomar la distancia correcta, es decir, las razones de Simplicius me impiden oponerle mi escepticismo, porque para ser escéptico, necesitas oponer razones, y en este caso, no las tengo yo. Las tiene él. Dónde está el punto débil.