www.transicionestructural.NET es un nuevo foro, que a partir del 25/06/2012 se ha separado de su homónimo .COM. No se compartirán nuevos mensajes o usuarios a partir de dicho día.
1 Usuario y 19 Visitantes están viendo este tema.
..........................................................................................Cita de: pisofobia en Abril 06, 2020, 11:37:24 amContinuando con mi post de anoche. Empleando datos reales. Encuesta de Condiciones de Vida. Año 2017. Hogares ponderados. Comparativa entre quienes viven de alquiler y quienes “arriendan” una propiedad. Perfil socioeconómico básico. No es posible distinguir si se alquilan inmuebles o terrenos. Fundamentalmente serán los primeros. Es un latrocinio. Las medidas se encaminan a salvaguardar los ingresos de quienes ya de entrada tienen una situación de partida notablemente mejor. Nada que objetar a ese hecho. Salvo que la política pública de vivie............................nda no debiera estar para eso. Al contrario. Fíjense en la disparidad de renta. En términos medianos, quienes viven de alquiler tienen unos ingresos netos anuales del hogar de 17.000 euros. Quienes alquilan propiedades 24.000 El doble. El resto lo verán en la tabla. Porcentajes a columna...................Fuente?....:::: :Link:: )Para 2018; encontre estohttps://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176807&menu=ultiDatos&idp=1254735976608(No encuentro el cuadro de arriba, Gracias)
Continuando con mi post de anoche. Empleando datos reales. Encuesta de Condiciones de Vida. Año 2017. Hogares ponderados. Comparativa entre quienes viven de alquiler y quienes “arriendan” una propiedad. Perfil socioeconómico básico. No es posible distinguir si se alquilan inmuebles o terrenos. Fundamentalmente serán los primeros. Es un latrocinio. Las medidas se encaminan a salvaguardar los ingresos de quienes ya de entrada tienen una situación de partida notablemente mejor. Nada que objetar a ese hecho. Salvo que la política pública de vivie............................nda no debiera estar para eso. Al contrario. Fíjense en la disparidad de renta. En términos medianos, quienes viven de alquiler tienen unos ingresos netos anuales del hogar de 17.000 euros. Quienes alquilan propiedades 24.000 El doble. El resto lo verán en la tabla. Porcentajes a columna.
Barceloneses alquilan apartamentos con licencia durante varias semanas para proteger a sus familiasEl horizonte del negocio de alquilar pisos por días a turistas está atestado de nubarrones. En estos momentos nadie sabe cuándo volverá a ser rentable esta actividad. La transformación parece obligada. En el portal inmobiliario Idealista ya detectaron cómo algunas viviendas dedicadas al alquiler vacacional se están pasando al de temporada. Y según Anna Puigdevall, gerente del Col·legi d’Agents de la Propietat Immobiliària, una vez finalice el estado de alarma, mientras aguardan la recuperación del turismo, los apartamentos turísticos legales pasarán del alquiler vacacional al de larga temporada. El salto conlleva una diferencia de rentabilidad del orden de cinco puntos. Pero aún es muy pronto para saber si esta circunstancia llegará a notarse de un modo significativo en el mercado convencional . Además, quién sabe qué hará la infinidad de propietarios de pisos turísticos ilegales. En el portal Pisos.com, Ferran Font, director de estudios de la plataforma, dice que ha desaparecido el 40% de la oferta vacacional que tenían, el 25% se ha dado de baja y el 15% ha pasado al alquiler. El sector toma nuevos caminos porque no se sabe cuándo volverán los turistas.
Las mafias del realquiler de pisos driblan los desahuciosPequeños propietarios a punto de recuperar sus viviendas ven sus lanzamientos suspendidosLos grupos organizados dedicados a alquilar pisos para subarrendarlos por días a turistas a través de las plataformas digitales, y también aquellos que trapichean con viviendas en el mercado negro de la ocupación, se están aprovechando de mala manera de la suspensión de los desahucios.Unos y otros están más relacionados de lo que parece. Y muchos pequeños propietarios, que tras meses de trámites y disgustos estaban a punto de recuperar sus inmuebles, se están quedando estos días con un palmo de narices.
https://www.lavanguardia.com/vida/20200408/48384731576/barceloneses-alquilan-partamentos-legales-durante-varias-semanas-para-proteger-a-sus-familias.htmlCitarBarceloneses alquilan apartamentos con licencia durante varias semanas para proteger a sus familiasEl horizonte del negocio de alquilar pisos por días a turistas está atestado de nubarrones. En estos momentos nadie sabe cuándo volverá a ser rentable esta actividad. La transformación parece obligada. En el portal inmobiliario Idealista ya detectaron cómo algunas viviendas dedicadas al alquiler vacacional se están pasando al de temporada. Y según Anna Puigdevall, gerente del Col·legi d’Agents de la Propietat Immobiliària, una vez finalice el estado de alarma, mientras aguardan la recuperación del turismo, los apartamentos turísticos legales pasarán del alquiler vacacional al de larga temporada. El salto conlleva una diferencia de rentabilidad del orden de cinco puntos. Pero aún es muy pronto para saber si esta circunstancia llegará a notarse de un modo significativo en el mercado convencional . Además, quién sabe qué hará la infinidad de propietarios de pisos turísticos ilegales. En el portal Pisos.com, Ferran Font, director de estudios de la plataforma, dice que ha desaparecido el 40% de la oferta vacacional que tenían, el 25% se ha dado de baja y el 15% ha pasado al alquiler. El sector toma nuevos caminos porque no se sabe cuándo volverán los turistas.
https://www.lavanguardia.com/local/barcelona/20200408/48384699990/realquiler-pisos-desahucios-mafias-barcelona.htmlCitarLas mafias del realquiler de pisos driblan los desahuciosPequeños propietarios a punto de recuperar sus viviendas ven sus lanzamientos suspendidosLos grupos organizados dedicados a alquilar pisos para subarrendarlos por días a turistas a través de las plataformas digitales, y también aquellos que trapichean con viviendas en el mercado negro de la ocupación, se están aprovechando de mala manera de la suspensión de los desahucios.Unos y otros están más relacionados de lo que parece. Y muchos pequeños propietarios, que tras meses de trámites y disgustos estaban a punto de recuperar sus inmuebles, se están quedando estos días con un palmo de narices.
Una parte de culpa de la burbuja del alquiler la tiene la inmigración, nos sorprenderíamos de ciudadanos de america del sur que alquilan pisos para realquilar las habitaciones.
Una parte de culpa de la burbuja del alquiler la tiene la inmigración, nos sorprenderíamos de ciudadanos de america del sur que alquilan pisos para realquilar las habitaciones. Hablo de este colectivo ya que es el que más contacto tengo, gimnasio, trabajo, barrio etc. Supongo que de otras partes también lo harán.
Carmen tiene 62 años y es propietaria de una vivienda en Toledo, donde reside y trabaja como médico de familia, y de otra en Madrid, un piso en el barrio de Ventas que alquila por el ya de por sí desinteresado precio de 500 euros al mes.
Is the Russell 2000 Index Bear Flag Setup a Warning to Investors?In the spirit of objectivity, we can look at the weekly chart of the Russell 2000 (IWM) as either a bear flag forming, or consolidation before another rally.
INTERVIEW: World set for long term oil demand destruction from coronavirus, Goldman's Currie saysPermanent changes to social behavior in the wake of coronavirus lockdowns are likely to hit long term oil demand forecasts and accelerate the shift to cleaner fuels but may be more modest than some forecasters predict, according to Jeff Currie, the global head of commodities research at Goldman Sachs.More modest consumption habits following months of enforced remote, home-based work, travel curbs and social distancing, are likely to mean oil demand growth may struggle to return to 100 million b/d in the near term, Currie said on Tuesday."We're forcing that energy transition, or the sustainable transition, on the demand side right now and a lot of it will probably stick," Currie told S&P Global Platts in an interview.Commuting to work, for example, consumes roughly 8 million b/d of oil globally, according to Currie. If the whole world decides to move to working from home one day of the week, oil demand would fall by about 1.6 million b/d, or about 1.5%.While global air travel consumes a further 8 million b/d of oil, Currie said he believes that leisure travel will return to former growth rates after lockdowns are lifted. Business-related air travel is the most vulnerable to remote working, Currie said, but still sees losses limited to around 25% of total air travel oil demand."So it's not this catastrophic gloom and doom backdrop that people are concerned about," he said. "But will (oil demand) rebound to 100 million b/d immediately? The answer is no. Will it rebound above 85 or 90 million b/d? Extremely likely."Pace of energy transitionAlthough hurting oil demand outlooks, the potential for the coronavirus crisis to accelerate the broader transition away from fossil fuels to cleaner, low carbon energy may be limited more on the supply side, Currie said.Technological progress is still needed to lower the costs and boost the availability of electric cars, solar and wind power, and other alternative energies he said."The supply side is going to be difficult," he said. "The technology is not ready to replace all of the world's airplanes and cars and, and with other types of technologies like EVs, we just don't have the technology to replace the aircraft."As a result of the lack of cheap, carbon-free alternatives to fossil fuels, new investment in oil and gas capacity is not going to be derailed any time soon, Currie believes."So we're going to be stuck with the question, do we rebuild these fossil fuel-based transportation sectors after this and increase drilling for fossil fuels, I tend to think we're going to have to," he said.
El Covid-19 es la ruina: la deuda supondrá el 342% del PIB mundial este añoLa factura del coronavirus, en términos económicos, no deja de subir. El mundo tuvo que endeudarse en dos billones solo en marzo. Y todo indica que esa tendencia continuará
Olvidad el pisito, está muertísimo.[…]Prepare for the worst.
Trump as the ultimate triumph of neoliberalismUntil Trump came to power the invasion of the political space by economic rules of behavior was concealed. There was a pretense that politicians treated people as citizens. The bubble was burst by Trump who, unschooled in the subtleties of democratic dialectics, could not see how anything could be wrong with the application of business rules to politics. Coming from the private sector, and from its most piracy-oriented segment dealing with the real estate, gambling and Miss Universe, he rightly thought—supported by the neoliberal ideology—that the political space is merely an extension of economics. Many accuse Trump of ignorance. But this is I think a wrong way to look at things. He may not be interested in the US constitution and complex rules that regulate politics in a democratic society because he, whether consciously or intuitively, thinks that they should not matter or even exist. The rules with which he is familiar are the rules of companies: “You are fired!”: a purely hierarchical decision, based on power consecrated by wealth, and unchecked by any other consideration.By introducing economics into politics, neoliberals have done an enormous harm to the “publicness” of decision-making and to democracy. They have brought many societies to a stage inferior to that of being ruled by self-interested despots. Mancur Olson in his famous distinction between rulers who are roving or stationary bandits recounts the anecdote of a Sicilian farmer who supports a one-man despotic rule by arguing that the ruler has “an all encompassing interest”: in order to maintain his rule and maximize his own tax intake, he does have an interest in prosperity of his subjects. This is different, and much superior, Olson argued, to a roving bandit who, like the Mongol invaders, has interest only in the short-term extraction from his (temporary) subjects.Why is a neoliberal ruler worse than the “all-encompassing-interest” despot? Precisely because he lacks the all-encompassing interest in his polity as he does not see himself as being part of it; rather he is the owner of a giant company called in this case the United States of America where he decides who should do what. People complain that Trump, in this crisis, is lacking the most elementary human compassion. But while they are right in diagnosis, they are wrong in understanding the origin of the lack of compassion. Like any rich owner he does not see that his role is to show compassion to his hired hands, but to decide what they should do, and even when the occasion presents itself, to squeeze them out of their pay, make them work harder or dismiss them without a benefit. In doing so to his putative countrymen he is just applying to an area called “politics” the principles that he has learned and used for many years in business. Trump is the best student of neoliberalism because he applies its principles without concealment.
Rents Are Late, and ‘It’s Only Going to Get Worse’As the economic shutdown pares tenants’ incomes, April payments have been reduced, deferred or withheld. Some landlords see their property at risk.First it was the waitress whose restaurant closed. Then the waiter, the bartender, the substitute teacher, the hairdresser, the tattoo artist and the Walgreens manager.One after the other, the tenants called and emailed their landlord, Bruce Brunner, to say they were out of work and the rent was going to be late. A week after the bill was due, some two dozen of Mr. Brunner’s 130 tenants had lost their jobs or had their hours reduced. He’s working out payment plans and using security deposits as a stopgap while directing tenants to the emerging patchwork of local, state and federal assistance programs.“Six weeks ago, you could name your price and you’d have multiple people applying,” said Mr. Brunner, who lives in Minneapolis, where he owns and manages 20 duplexes and triplexes across the city. “Now you’re deferring and working out payment plans, and it’s only going to get worse.”One week after the first of the month, tenants nationwide are already struggling with rents. In interviews with two dozen landlords — including companies with tens of thousands of units, nonprofit developers who house the working poor, and mom-and-pop operators living next door to their tenants — property owners say their collections have plunged as much of the economy has shut down to prevent the spread of the deadly coronavirus.(...)“The whole market just changed,” said Gustavo Lopez, a property manager in the San Francisco Bay Area.Nearly 10 million people have filed unemployment claims over the past two weeks. It’s too early to gauge how broadly these numbers will translate to the loss of rent: Many tenants are within the grace period before their rent is declared late. Some can stitch things together for a while by getting deferrals, applying their security deposits or paying with credit cards.Still, early findings suggest that April is looking bad and lend credence to Mr. Brunner’s opinion that May will be much worse. The National Multifamily Housing Council, a trade group for big apartment owners and developers, compiled data tracking rent payments across some 13.4 million units nationwide. It showed that through the first five days of April, 31 percent of tenants had so far failed to pay their rent, compared with 18 percent in the same period a year ago.(...)For several decades, the nation’s affordable-housing stock has fallen sharply, particularly “naturally occurring affordable housing” — run-down buildings that offer low rents without government subsidy. Since much of this housing is operated by smaller landlords, Ms. Yentel fears that without any aid to landlords, the buildings could go into default and be picked up by investors who will renovate them for higher-paying tenants after the crisis subsides.“One way or the other, we have to get aid to smaller landlords so that the precious affordable-housing stock we have still exists on the other end of this crisis,” she said.According to the Joint Center for Housing Studies at Harvard University, a quarter of the nation’s 44 million renter households paid more than half their income in rent in 2018. Separate research from the Federal Reserve showed four in 10 Americans would have difficulty covering a sudden $400 expense, suggesting that tens of millions of tenants are just a week of missed work away from falling behind on their housing bills.For the past four years, rent increases have helped stir a nationwide tenant uprising that led to the biggest expansion of tenants’ rights in decades. Rent control laws were enacted in New York, Oregon and California, and tenants organized mass actions, like a group of mothers in Oakland who occupied an empty house for two months to protest house flipping.Now, after years of coordination, organizers see the coronavirus pandemic as a galvanizing force. Last week, the Right to the City Alliance, a national coalition of tenant and racial-justice organizations, held a digital #CancelRent rally to call for rents to be eliminated as long as people can’t work. Homes Guarantee, a national tenants’ campaign, has been holding weekly strategy calls.“This is a moment of clarity about a broken system in which 11 million people were already paying over 50 percent of their income on rent,” said Tara Raghuveer, a tenant organizer in Kansas City and director of Homes Guarantee.
Nearly a Third of U.S. Renters Didn’t Pay April Rent