www.transicionestructural.NET es un nuevo foro, que a partir del 25/06/2012 se ha separado de su homónimo .COM. No se compartirán nuevos mensajes o usuarios a partir de dicho día.
0 Usuarios y 5 Visitantes están viendo este tema.
London dragging down UK productivity as office staff work from homeLondon is dragging down Britain’s productivity growth as office staff continue to work from home, new figures show.Productivity in the capital tumbled in 2022, according to the Office for National Statistics, taking output per hour worked – a key tool to measure each employee’s efforts – to its lowest level since 2009.London’s productivity dropped by 2.7pc between 2019 and 2022, the ONS said, with Wales the only other region to fall.The strongest growth came in the North West of England, where productivity jumped by 7.9pc over the same period.Dwindling productivity in the capital is a hangover from the pandemic, according to economists, as they said remote working has harmed growth.Adrian Pabst at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) said: “There are very few jobs which can be done as well at home as they can be at the office.“Working zero days from the office, which you can see in the Civil Service, is just not working out.“There is not the same coordination, not the same interactions and people do not feel as motivated. There are all sorts of things that do not happen when you are in the office.”London has been more affected by remote working than other parts of the country because it has a large proportion of office workers.In late 2022 and early 2023, almost 60pc of all London workers were either entirely at home or hybrid working.That was far greater than in any other part of the nation, and compared to as little as 36pc in the North West.In 2022, a survey from the Office for National Statistics revealed that 44pc of businesses in London intended to embed greater levels of home working – which was again more than in any other region.However, a follow-up to that questionnaire this month showed the share had fallen to 29pc.That is still above other parts of the UK but suggests that many companies are moving away from remote working.Mr Pabst said the return of workers to the office was expected to boost the capital’s productivity in the years to come.He said: “It took a while for people to see the negative side-effects. They all like the positives – they do not like to commute, they can see more of their families – but people did not see the negatives, and they took a while to become clear.“London took longer to recover from Covid. It is picking up again, and we are now projecting higher productivity growth rates in London than in other parts of the country. Most people have readjusted and are doing three to four days from the office.”However, London is still struggling with other problems that pull down productivity, Mr Pabst said: “The lack of affordable housing means productivity growth is struggling. People have to commute for a lot longer. It costs money, it takes time and energy. The lack of housing in areas where it is required has not helped.“There are still areas of London which are not well-served by trains or tubes or buses and people find that driving isn’t easy either. Transport connectivity is a question as well.”
The Crises and Sacrifices Yet to ComeThe timing of finally embracing risk and sacrifice as the only option left is exquisitely sensitive: finally caving in a moment too late leads to the system collapsing beyond recovery.The sense that we're approaching a tipping point into a crisis with no easy resolution is pervasive, a sense that beneath the veneer of normalcy (the Federal Reserve will lower interest rates and that will fix everything), we sense the precariousness of this brittle normalcy.While many are uneasily scanning the horizon for geopolitical crises, others see the crisis emerging here at home, possibly a political crisis or a financial crisis that ensnares us all.Few look at the decay of our social order as the source of crisis. Few seem to notice that corruption has become so normalized that we don't even recognize the ubiquity and depth of our corruption; we tell ourselves that this isn't corruption, it's just healthy self-interest, the "invisible hand" of the market magically organizing our economy to optimize efficiency and productivity. This provides cover for our worship of self-interest, a polite phrase for limitless greed.While the media glorifies illusions of salvation and grandeur (AI!), few look at what's been lost in the decay of our social order, a list that starts with sacrifice for the common good and civic virtue.The American Dream has a peculiarly truncated vision of sacrifice: we make individual sacrifices to advance our personal goals, but sacrifices for the common good are not part of the Dream: sacrifices for the sake of our fellow citizens are at best unnecessary and at worst a waste of money, something only chumps fall for.The Smart Money spends a fortune evading taxes, as part of the prevailing ethos: Get rich by whatever means are necessary and let the Devil take the hindmost.What few seem to have noticed is specific classes of the citizenry have already been sacrificed to clear the path for limitless greed and corruption to reap the spoils. These classes include the majority of the citizenry, the bottom 90%, though the burdens of the systemic cannibalization / predation have fallen most heavily on the bottom 50%, whose share of the nation's financial wealth is effectively signal noise: 2.6%.The generational divide is equally stark: Boomers hold 51% of household wealth, while Millennials hold a mere 9%.The divide between wage earners and owners of capital is staggering, yet of little interest to the financial media: Labor's share of gross domestic income (GDI) has declined for decades, resulting in the transfer of $149 trillion from wage earners to owners of capital:The sacrifices yet to come will fall on everyone, but they will fall most heavily on capital as capital has scooped up the vast majority of the financial gains for the past 45 years. The owners of capital are already whining, as if the addition of $50 trillion to their wealth in the past four years is their birthright, the legitimate rewards of their brilliant creation of stupendous gains in productivity rather than the illegitimate gains of a centrally planned bubble that enriched the few at the expense of the many.We are reluctant to face the consequences of our corruption and our vastly unequal economy. The dynamics of our ability to rationalize away the coming crisis are crystalized in this graphic composed by Dave Pollard in his post Why We Cannot Prevent Collapse*:In summary, we are fixated on the short-term, enamored by our own power, intoxicated by normalization and conditioned to being "saved", confident that our salvation will be delivered via a painless central bank "save" should anything threaten to overturn our apple cart.Financial podcaster Emerson Fersch asks a cogent question: what catalyst will finally tip the system into disorderly incoherence? My answer is the core of our recent podcast, Crisis, Sacrifice and the New Economy.**I don't have a crisp answer that fits in a Tweet or a Tik-Tok video because any prediction is nothing more than a guess due to the nature of the global economic system: an open, (i.e. emergent) tightly bound system that has veered far from equilibrium and is prone to sudden drops into chaotic disorder in which there are no guarantees that the previous stability / equilibrium can be restored.We know a few things that offer some minimal guidance. We know that in complex, highly interconnected /tightly bound systems, small perturbances can generate large effects.We also know that should events occur faster than the system's stabilizing feedbacks can respond, the system is highly prone to collapse.We also know that humans don't change anything that requires exposure to open-ended risk and sacrifice until there is no other choice.Lastly, we know that the timing of finally embracing risk and sacrifice as the only option left is exquisitely sensitive: finally caving in a moment too late leads to the system collapsing beyond recovery. When this moment arrives, who will be ready and who will resist, rationalize and prevaricate until it's too late?When we're finally ready to bargain--OK, we'll sacrifice a bit--it's too late to stop the whirlwind.
Lo que realmente mola es obligar a otros a hacer lo que creemos que nos conviene. Es decir, la idea de libertad que proclamamos es más falsa que un billete de 20 céntimos de euro.[...]Un muy cordial saludo
China: China’s housing market slump is deepening, which is putting pressure on industrial metals. Here are new home prices (month-over-month):The United States: Real income expectations hit the lowest levels in over a decade.
https://www.expansion.com/economia/financial-times/2024/06/14/666c5edc468aebd2198b459e.htmlSaludos.
Obviamente, siempre fueron precios falsos.(...)¿Cuántos meses para que llegue aquí el efecto?Tras la explosión hay varios efectos: 1- Onda de choque.2- Radiación térmica.3- Radiación ionizante.4- Efectos posteriores.(...)
https://www.pressreader.com/spain/Cinco-Dias/20240615/page/2/textviewMusk cree que sus humanoides Optimus nos harán felices sin tener que comer perdiceshttps://cincodias.elpais.com/companias/2024-06-14/las-cuentas-de-elon-musk-para-que-tesla-gane-un-billon-de-dolares-al-ano-solo-con-sus-robots.htmlSaludos.
El PP presenta su propia Ley de Vivienda para derogar el límite del alquiler en zonas tensionadasLos de Núñez Feijóo no descartan pactar con Junts para conseguir aprobar la medidaImpondrá medidas para acabar con la "tolerancia" con la ocupación ilegal(...) evitará que los propietarios "carguen" con la situación de "posible vulnerabilidad" de las familias arrendatarias. "(...)
https://www.eleconomista.es/economia/noticias/12868165/06/24/el-pp-contraprograma-a-sanchez-y-presenta-su-propia-ley-de-vivienda.htmlCitarEl PP presenta su propia Ley de Vivienda para derogar el límite del alquiler en zonas tensionadasLos de Núñez Feijóo no descartan pactar con Junts para conseguir aprobar la medidaImpondrá medidas para acabar con la "tolerancia" con la ocupación ilegal(...) evitará que los propietarios "carguen" con la situación de "posible vulnerabilidad" de las familias arrendatarias. "(...)