PPCC: Pisitófilos Creditófagos. Primavera 2025

[pollo]

https://okdiario.com/madrid/ayuso-acusa-sanchez-ser-complice-okupas-normalizar-crimen-14790232

Esta es tonta.

Ya se sabía de cuando no era famosa.

Si aparenta algo de inteligencia es porque quien la maneja de marioneta sí que discurre.

[el malo]

https://www.elespanol.com/invertia/disruptores/ecosistema-startup/startups/20250519/startup-permite-comprar-habitaciones-lugar-pisos-capta-revolucionar-mercado-vivienda/1003743759818_0.html

Más madera, más estafa.

Startups e IA para la compra de habitaciones para himbertir.

¿Quién dijo que en España no somos emprendedores?

Esto ya se intentó con el boom del blockchain. A alguien se le ocurrió la genial idea de tokenizar un pisito y poner los tokens en venta. Algo así como una multipropiedad en la que tenías el retorno del alquiler según hubieras invertido.

No recuerdo si la idea se llegó a implementar o se quedó en Powerpoint, pero sí haberlo leído y pensado que qué podía salir mal.

Sin irnos a la tokenización, en Reino Unido está extendido vender, por ej, el 35% de una propiedad "con derecho a habitar". Posees un porcentaje y pagas un alquiler a la otra parte por vivir en "tu" casa. Negocio redondo, tienes hipoteca Y alquier. Pagas tu parte proporcional de todos los gastos como propietario y no estás a salvo de las subidas que el otro socio quiera meterte porque tiene un porcentaje mayoritario de "tu" casa.

Aquí se buscarán las vueltas y más vueltas para estirar el chicle. Yo también creo que la cosa morirá de éxito y en una cama junto con el último rentista boomer. Estoy haciendo unos cálculos para presentar a RRHH de mi empresa de por qué me cuesta encontrar perfiles y es desolador. Y NO es un problema de sueldos, es un problema de ciudades.

[Cadavre Exquis]

https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1924187009477738653

Saludos.

[mpt]

Estás ignorando a este usuario. Muéstrame el mensaje.

La diferencia es como bien dices el rentismo, .......

uno de los pilares del rentismo; y que pudo ser una ventaja local para aminorar el mundial problema del pisito; subir los impuestos a la tenencia

......
En cuanto a su tenencia, ...... que menos carga fiscal tiene sobre ella, .....

No hay ningún interés en cambiar el entramado, les va la vida y sus gobelas, en ello, ya saben la máxima de toda nuestra clase política: después de nosotros, el diluvio.

sirva de muestra uno que ha asesorado a muchos

Javier Burón, autor de 'El problema de la vivienda': "Tenemos que aceptar que el mercado está fracasando y que las políticas de vivienda son malas" https://search.app/eaGnjeKhworrGNFt6

de los problemas mundiales

https://www.vozpopuli.com/internacional/esteban-hernandez-nuestras-elites-estan-en-la-negacion-de-la-realidad.html

parece evidente que todo ha de empeorar aun mucho, salvo el éxito de milei en las elecciones municipales, rumania, portugal, polonia, alemania, ..... to controlado

[Derby]

Ya nos lo suponíamos...menudos estrategas  La estupidez humana no conoce límites.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/scott-bessent-says-tariff-uncertainty-161553570.html

Scott Bessent says tariff uncertainty is a tactic — otherwise countries ‘would play us in the negotiations’

The Treasury secretary said "strategic uncertainty" is a tactic as the U.S. engages in talks over the Trump administration's tariffs, arguing that too much certainty would allow other countries to "play us in the negotiations." That comes as companies, trading partners, and financial markets have endured whiplash from on-again, off-again tariffs.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested that the Trump administration's tariff zig-zags are a feature, not a bug.

During an interview on CNN's State of the Union that aired on Sunday, he was asked about the whiplash from the president's on-again, off-again tariffs, and replied that the administration’s negotiating tactic is "strategic uncertainty."

"If we were to give too much certainty to the other countries, then they would play us in the negotiations," Bessent explained. "I am confident that at the end of these negotiations, both the retailers, the American people and the American workers will be better off." 

Since President Donald Trump launched his trade war, he has repeatedly imposed steep tariffs, then put them on hold or partially rolled them back soon after.

That was on display as recently as Monday, when the U.S. and China agreed to slash their respective duties on each other for 90 days.

More whiplash could be on the way amid talks over the so-called reciprocal tariffs that Trump unveiled on "Liberation Day" then put on hold days later.

On Friday, Trump said the U.S. can’t negotiate with all the countries that were hit with tariffs, so some trading partners will find out in a letter in two or three weeks what rate they will face.

Bessent said Sunday that any countries not negotiating in good faith will see tariffs snap back to the Liberation Day level. He added that there are 18 "important" trading partners the U.S. is most focused on, while there are a lot smaller ones for which "we can just come up with a number."

"My other sense is that we will do a lot of regional deals — 'this is the rate for Central America, this is the rate for this part of Africa,'" Bessent added.

Going back to the April 2 tariff levels would likely dampen financial markets, which have rallied as Trump continues to ease his stance on tariffs. But levies on China will still be at historically high levels, even as they drop to 30% from 145%.

When asked about the tariff impact on small businesses that rely on Chinese imports, Bessent told CNN that the U.S. "will continue trading with China in the kinds of products that these small businesses are talking about at lower tariff levels."(...)

[Derby]

Otro éxito de Trump  y cada vez pinta peor para Zelensky.

Trump leaves Russia and Ukraine to settle war in talks

US leader’s comments that negotiations will begin ‘immediately’ contrasts with more guarded statement from Putin


Donald Trump vowed to end the war in Ukraine on day one of his second term, but peace has so far proven elusive © Olga Maltseva/Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

Donald Trump said on Monday that Russia and Ukraine would begin negotiations “immediately” on preparations for peace talks, but added that he was leaving Moscow and Kyiv to find a deal without the US as a broker.

After a two-hour call with Vladimir Putin, Trump posted that “Russia and Ukraine will immediately start negotiations toward a Ceasefire and, more importantly, an END to the War”.

But in separate comments the Russian president sounded far more tentative about any process and did not spell out a substantive change in the Kremlin’s stance.

In remarks that indicated that Washington may be stepping back from a role as a mediator, Trump said the “conditions” for a deal could only be negotiated by the warring parties “because they know details of a negotiation that nobody else would be aware of”.

He also said the Vatican would be “very interested” in hosting the talks, adding: “Let the process begin!”

In his own, more guarded readout of the conversation, Putin said he was “ready to work” with Kyiv on a memorandum to frame future talks, which could include a possible ceasefire “for a certain amount of time”.

Putin told a state media reporter that the conversation with Trump had been “very candid and therefore very useful”. But he did not announce any major shifts in Russia’s position on the war in Ukraine. 

“We agreed with the US president that Russia will propose and is ready to work with the Ukrainian side on a memorandum about the possible future peace agreement,” the Russian president said.

He added that the memorandum would include “the principles on which a peace agreement would be based, the timing of a possible peace agreement” and “a possible ceasefire for a certain amount of time, if certain agreements are reached”.

Putin also said that Russia’s main objective was still “to eliminate the root causes of this crisis”, in language that signalled his key demands remain unchanged.

Last week, his negotiators demanded that Kyiv withdraw from swaths of its territory, including the cities of Kherson and Zaporizhzhia and threatened to occupy more territory should Ukraine refuse.

Trump also said that immediately after the call with Putin, he gave his account of the conversation to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy together with the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Finland and the European Commission.

One person familiar with the conversation said the leaders on the call were stunned by the US president’s description of what was agreed. They added it was clear Trump was “not ready to put greater pressure” on Putin to come to the negotiating table in earnest.

Merz said all participants in the call “reaffirmed their willingness to closely support Ukraine on its path toward a ceasefire”.

The phone call came after Putin last week refused to attend peace talks with Ukraine in Turkey that he himself initiated, prompting Trump to say that “nothing is going to happen” until he and the Russian president met in person.

Diplomatic efforts to end the conflict have accelerated in recent weeks, with Russia and Ukraine holding direct talks in Istanbul on Friday, their first since the start of the three-year war.

Trump vowed to end the war on day one of his second term but peace has proven elusive, with both sides still far apart.

In European capitals, leaders fear that Trump could cut a deal with Putin that accedes to his maximalist demands and sells out Ukraine’s interests in his haste to end the fighting.

[sudden and sharp]

Ya nos lo suponíamos...menudos estrategas  La estupidez humana no conoce límites.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/scott-bessent-says-tariff-uncertainty-161553570.html

Scott Bessent says tariff uncertainty is a tactic — otherwise countries ‘would play us in the negotiations’

The Treasury secretary said "strategic uncertainty" is a tactic as the U.S. engages in talks over the Trump administration's tariffs, arguing that too much certainty would allow other countries to "play us in the negotiations." That comes as companies, trading partners, and financial markets have endured whiplash from on-again, off-again tariffs.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent suggested that the Trump administration's tariff zig-zags are a feature, not a bug.

During an interview on CNN's State of the Union that aired on Sunday, he was asked about the whiplash from the president's on-again, off-again tariffs, and replied that the administration’s negotiating tactic is "strategic uncertainty."

"If we were to give too much certainty to the other countries, then they would play us in the negotiations," Bessent explained. "I am confident that at the end of these negotiations, both the retailers, the American people and the American workers will be better off." 

Since President Donald Trump launched his trade war, he has repeatedly imposed steep tariffs, then put them on hold or partially rolled them back soon after.

That was on display as recently as Monday, when the U.S. and China agreed to slash their respective duties on each other for 90 days.

More whiplash could be on the way amid talks over the so-called reciprocal tariffs that Trump unveiled on "Liberation Day" then put on hold days later.

On Friday, Trump said the U.S. can’t negotiate with all the countries that were hit with tariffs, so some trading partners will find out in a letter in two or three weeks what rate they will face.

Bessent said Sunday that any countries not negotiating in good faith will see tariffs snap back to the Liberation Day level. He added that there are 18 "important" trading partners the U.S. is most focused on, while there are a lot smaller ones for which "we can just come up with a number."

"My other sense is that we will do a lot of regional deals — 'this is the rate for Central America, this is the rate for this part of Africa,'" Bessent added.

Going back to the April 2 tariff levels would likely dampen financial markets, which have rallied as Trump continues to ease his stance on tariffs. But levies on China will still be at historically high levels, even as they drop to 30% from 145%.

When asked about the tariff impact on small businesses that rely on Chinese imports, Bessent told CNN that the U.S. "will continue trading with China in the kinds of products that these small businesses are talking about at lower tariff levels."(...)

Lo estoy veyendo que dirían en burbuja... :

Tactics... (Administración USA)

Tariffs ? (Resto del mundo)