Transición hacia una Internet censurada. Y mientras, en el cortijo...

[1929]

http://technolog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/02/01/10290056-google-to-censor-blogger-blogs-by-country

Google to censor Blogger blogs by country

Google
By Suzanne Choney

Google says some blogs on Blogger, its blogging platform, will be blocked on a "per country basis," in order to comply with "removal request" laws of nations where freedom of speech is not cherished or allowed.
The move seems to coincide with Twitter's recent announcement that it will censor tweets, or posts, in various countries at the request of governments, although the Blogger change was posted Jan. 9, but only reported on Tuesday by the website TechDows.
To deal with government censorship, Google said that some blogs may be redirected on the Web to a different "country-code top level domain," or ccTLD. "For example, if you're in Australia and viewing [blogname].blogspot.com, you might be redirected [blogname].blogspot.com.au. A ccTLD, when it appears, corresponds with the country of the reader’s current location."

In a Q&A about the change, Google said:
Migrating to localized domains will allow us to continue promoting free expression and responsible publishing while providing greater flexibility in complying with valid removal requests pursuant to local law. By utilizing ccTLDs, content removals can be managed on a per country basis, which will limit their impact to the smallest number of readers. Content removed due to a specific country’s law will only be removed from the relevant ccTLD.

Blog owners "should not see any visible differences to their blog other than the URL redirecting to a ccTLD," Google said.
And, there is a workaround for blog readers, who "may request a specific country version of the blogspot content by entering a specially formatted 'NCR' URL," Google says.
NCR means "No Country Redirect," and "will always display buzz.blogger.com in English, whether you’re in India, Brazil, Honduras, Germany, or anywhere," Google said.
Google has applied such workarounds before. For several years, Google agreed to censor its search results in China, but stopped doing that a few years ago after a dispute with China's government. Google, according to a recent Associated Press story, "now routes its Chinese search results through Hong Kong, where the censorship rules are less restrictive."

[Reg]

Siempre hay alternativas, una, cada vez más depurada es http://freenetproject.org/. Es una especie de WWW alternativa. Sigue chupando bastantes recursos en windows al usar Java, pero es cada vez más fácil de usar. Se puede usar con distintos niveles de seguridad y es más fácil que usar Tor, no tiene demasiados usuarios y es un poco rara, pero siempre me ha gustado.

[scytal]

Estados Unidos incauta 307 dominios, la operación más grande hasta la fecha


as autoridades federales de Estados Unidos han confiscado y cerrado de una “tacada” hasta 307 dominios, 16 de ellos supuestamente involucrados en la reproducción o enlaces de deporte en streaming y el resto en la venta de mercancía supuestamente falsa de deporte. Un movimiento que se produce a pocos días del conocido como Super Sunday en el país.

El movimiento se trataría de la mayor incautación hasta la fecha en el país que habría acumulado un total de 650 dominios cerrados desde que comenzara a estar operativo allá por el mes de junio del 2010. Además, se produce unos días antes de que se juegue el partido de la NFL entre los New England Patriots y los New York Giants.

Como hicieran con rojadirecta, los federales han tomado los dominios .com, .org y .net. Junto a los dominios, ICE informa que se hará lo mismo con las cuentas bancarias y otros bienes relacionados a la presunta actividad ilícita.

http://alt1040.com/2012/02/estados-unidos-incauta-307-dominios-la-operacion-mas-grande-hasta-la-fecha


Estuvieron rapidos los chicos de thepiratebay al cambiar el dominio a .SE . EL problema será que no les pase nada allí, ya que suecia también es bastante combativa con temas de "pirateria" (como odio esta palabra mientras se les llama "paraísos fiscales" a las cuevas de ladrones.

[Pensativo]

El otro día Twitter, ahora Blogger (el servicio de blogs de Google)... ¿os imaginais la wikipedia dando una información distinta dependiendo del país desde el que se consulte? Por eso es fundamental tener una internet abierta y con cuantos más servicios promovidos desde instituciones sin ánimo de lucro y por el interés público mejor, (como Wikipedia, la EFF, la FSF, software libre, estándares abiertos...) y no controlada por un puñado de grandes empresas (Google, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft-Hotmail-Bing-Messenger, etc...) que la intentan conviertir en una serie de parcelas privadas de usuarios cautivos y que ignoren los derechos fundamentales -como la libertad de expresión (que solo el anonimato garantiza), el derecho a la intimidad y a la inviolabilidad de las comunicaciones- según sus intereses comerciales en connivencia con el afán de control y  censura de los gobiernos de los paises en donde operan...

http://www.genbeta.com/bitacoras/google-blogger-se-apunta-a-la-censura-por-paises

Google Blogger se apunta a la censura por países

Hace pocos días conocimos la decisión de Twitter de, en lugar de eliminar tweets, eliminarlos de la vista de usuarios en ciertos países donde sean ilegales (de manera que un tweet con un mensaje de apología al terrorismo, ilegal en España, no sería visible desde aquí pero sí desde otro país donde no fuera ilegal). La decisión ha sido duramente criticada por parte de muchos sectores de Internet y ensalzada por otros tantos.

La cuestión es que otros parecen haber tomado ejemplo de Twitter, como Google, que empezará a aplicar un mecanismo similar en los blogs alojados en Blogger. La solución pasa por redireccionar los blogs que usan una URL acabada en blogspot.com a los dominios locales (blogspot.com.au en el caso de Australia, etc).

No obstante el propio Google ofrece una manera simple de saltarse el mecanismo. Si queremos visitar el blog http://genbeta.blogspot.com/ (¡existe, aunque parezca mentira!) pero el contenido está bloqueado en nuestro país, podemos acceder siempre a la versión estadounidense añadiendo /ncr al final de la dirección, así: http://genbeta.blogspot.com/ncr (como cuando queremos acceder a la versión estadounidense de Google).

Los blogs que utilicen dominios propios no se verán afectados por esta medida, que de nuevo estoy seguro de que va a recibir duras críticas. Yo, personalmente, no estoy de acuerdo con este tipo de censura territorial: Internet es uno y no debería tener fronteras.

Es cojonudo. Te venden globalización con una mano y con la otra te convierten en localista el medio global por excelencia.

Haz lo que yo diga, no lo que yo haga.

[Pensativo]

Por cierto, ¿alguna buena alternativa a Gmail?

[Reg]

Por cierto, ¿alguna buena alternativa a Gmail?

Un dominio compartido entre varios amigos sale a buen precio, usando pop y un programa portable en un pincho para el correo, siempre tienes tus correos a mano.

[Currobena]

Artículo sobre la rebelión en Europa contra ACTA, con fotos:

Widespread Protests Are Starting to Turn the Tide Against Anti-Democratic Bill

The widespread protests against the anti-democracy bill ACTA by the Polish people have forced Poland’s prime minister to stall – or perhaps even back out – of the treaty. As TechDirt notes:

    Following the growing protests about ACTA in Europe, as well as signs of US meddling, Poland’s prime minister is making it clear that Poland will not ratify ACTA for the time being, leading to speculation that the EU may not actually join ACTA.

        Tusk’s backtracking could spell the end of ACTA for the entire European Union. If Poland or any other EU member state, or the European Parliament itself, fails to ratify the document, it becomes null and void across the union. As it stands, there are already five member countries that have not even signed ACTA.

        “I share the opinions of those who from the beginning said that consultations were not complete,” Tusk said, according to a report in Wirtualna Polska. The 54-year-old prime minister added that a Polish rejection of ACTA is now on the table, and admitted that he had previously approached the agreement from a “20th century” perspective, due to his age.

The Slovenian ambassador to Japan has apologized to her country and her children for signing ACTA, saying she signed it because her government told her to, and “out of civic carelessness” in not bothering to understand what ACTA meant before signing it.

Bulgarian and Polish MPs wore Guy Fawkes masks to protest ACTA. Again, from TechDirt:

    We recently pointed out that a bunch of Polish politicians wore Guy Fawkes/Anonymous masks in Parliament to protest ACTA:

    SO53v Europe Rises Up Against ACTAIt appears that some politicians in Bulgaria thought that was a good idea, and have done the same thing:

    V22Lv Europe Rises Up Against ACTA

Indeed, even the elderly are wearing Guy Fawkes masks in protest of ACTA:
z6qZu Europe Rises Up Against ACTA

European Parliamentarian Marietje Schaake writes:

    As a Member of the European Parliament, I very much welcome the increased attention the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) has received in the past weeks. It has taken a while for massive outcry to emerge, but we are seeing protest voices getting louder and louder.

ARS Technica reports that the Greek Ministry of Justice was hacked by anonymous:

    The Greek Ministry of Justice had its Web site defaced by Greek and Cypriot Anonymous-affiliated hackers (a mirror of the defaced site is available here). The hackers included a video message (now removed) complaining that the Greek government had abandoned the democratic will of its people and was instead bending to the will of the IMF and the EU.

    Greece is expected to accept IMF funds in an effort to allow its government to bring some semblance of sustainability to its finances, but Anonymous believes that this move will “introduce a new dictatorship upon [the Greek] people’s shoulders and allow the bankers and the monarchs of the EU to enslave them both economically and politically.”

    The defaced site itself focused on an anti-ACTA message. It warned that Greece had two weeks to “stop ACTA,” and that if it failed to do so, some 300 sites would be defaced. The next targets will include both media and ministry sites, with the hackers announcing that they already had passwords for most sites and that this was “JUST the BEGINING [sic].”

Swedes are out in force protesting ACTA. As The Local reports:

    Over 10,000 Swedes had pledged to take part in demonstrations in Stockholm and other cities on Saturday to protest against the ACTA anti-piracy legislation which is set to go before the Riksdag later this year.

    The demonstration, held at midday on Sergels Torg in the centre of Stockholm, featured speeches from MEPs Christian Engström of the Pirate Party, Carl Schlyter of the Green Party and Mikael Gustavsson of the Left Party.

    Over eleven thousand people had signed up to attend the Stockholm demonstration on Facebook by 10am on Saturday.

    Christian Engström told the Dagens Nyheter (DN) daily that with indications that Poland’s parliament is set to reject the controversial international anti-piracy legislation, the pirate movement had wind in its sails.

    “1.4 million signatures have been collected through an online petition and there have been riots in Poland. There now seems to be a commitment among citizens so I feel very hopeful,” he told DN.

By all accounts, the number of ACTA protests in Europe is overwhelming:
7Vj5G Europe Rises Up Against ACTA

But that only tells half of the story.

As Pirate Party found Rick Falvinge reports:

Just look at this map. I’ve never seen anything like it in terms of people all across Europe demanding their freedom of speech and being angry against backroom corporativist deals that steals their most basic civil liberties.

***

This is not Hollywood versus Silicon Valley, as oldmedia likes to frame it. This is Hollywood versus The People. For decades, they have trained us to think in black and white, in good versus evil fighting for domination of the free world. And now, they’ve gone and put themselves in the role of evil villain.

The copyright cartel thought they were battling Google.

They’re not.

They’re waging war against the people, with the help of the politicians.

And we’re not standing for it. We can’t change the copyright cartel, but we can send a clear message to the politicians that 250 million Europeans sharing and preserving contemporary culture is not a problem. It is a power base of 250 million voters that will kick you out of office if you dare so much as touch the net.

And there are visible cracks in the façade, especially seeing Poland falter and the copyright cartels visibly shaken from the SOPA defeat in the US, with the politicians having started to pay attention to what the Internet wants. We can win this.

Today, Sweden rallies. List of rallies below (via Christian Engström, Member of European Parliament):

    Stockholm: Sergels Torg, 12 noon. [Facebook]
    Göteborg: Götaplatsen, 12 noon. [Facebook]
    Malmö: Stortorget, at the Karl X Gustav statue, 12 noon. [Facebook]
    Helsingborg: at the Magnus Stenbock statue, 13:00. [Facebook]
    Umeå : Apberget, 12 noon. [Facebook]
    Kalmar: Giraffens Köpcentrum, 12 noon. [Facebook]
    Sundsvall: Torget, 12 noon. [Facebook]
    Karlstad: Stora Torget, 12 noon. [Facebook]
    Borlänge: Jussi Björlings torg, 12 noon. [Facebook]

(The observant will note that less than half of these rallies are marked on the already-impressive map of European rallies. Makes me wonder what the map would look like if all rallies were included.)

Most of Europe will rally next Saturday, on February 11. That’s going to be something, too. Let’s give Europe the best of precursor to those rallies from Sweden that they could possibly get!

As of early morning on February 4, 11,000 people have committed to coming to the Stockholm rally, with another 3,500 maybes. Those are numbers that would overfill the Plattan plaza by a wide margin. I’ll be at the rally in Stockholm, Sweden, and will be taking plenty of imagery and will follow up here.

UPDATE AT 1500: ***

anti ACTA stockholm Feb04 621x349 Europe Rises Up Against ACTARally at the Sergels Torg plaza in Stockholm, Sweden. Anna Troberg, leader of the Swedish Pirate Party, speaking (at left) and maybe 1/3 of the crowd.

The turnout was like nothing I’ve seen for a February rally in Sweden. In -20°C, there were well over a thousand people protesting corporate rights over their freedom of speech; normally, you’re lucky getting 50.

Also, there was a very clear recurring theme among the Members of European Parliament speaking, MEPs from three different parties. They all told the story of how software patents had been defeated in Europe, followed by the crucial “amendment 138″ in the Telecoms Package, which aimed to shut people off en masse from the Net. Well, thanks to diligent activists and people on the inside, we managed to get as strong safeguards in place as possible against shutting people off. But the monopoly lobbyists never quit. Now they’re at it again, this time saying that if authorities can’t shut people off en masse due to that “amendment 138″, maybe they can get private corporations – the ISPs – to do it instead through third-party liability forcing certain terms of service and wiretapping. Hence, ACTA.

Fortunately, and this was a consistent message from all Members of European Parliament, we have the blueprint for defeating ACTA. We need to repeat what we did with the software patents and with the Telecoms Package. It takes hard work, it takes tons of activism, but we know exactly what to do and how to do it, and most importantly: we know that we can win.

As the rally concluded, everybody was determined to win this fight, having heard the clear message that it takes work but is perfectly doable.

UPDATE 2: There are more photos from Christian Engström, Member of European Parliament here. Free for any use (CC0 / Public Domain). Here’s one of his photos, showing the protester crowd:

Enlace:

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2012/02/europe-rises-up-against-acta/

[1929]

[urlhttp://www.prisonplanet.com/shouting-cameras-bark-orders-at-residents-to-leave-their-own-property.html[/url]

London Council says police state machines were activated by mistake   
Steve Watson

Prisonplanet.com
February 7, 2012

Residents of a block of flats in North London were outraged to discover cameras in their gardens barking out orders, telling them to leave the area immediately and that they were being monitored by the authorities.
In a scene that wouldn’t look out of place in the movie Robocop, one resident captured footage of the shouting cameras telling him “Stop, this is a restricted area and your photograph is being taken.” 
The robotic American voice then warned that the images would “be sent for processing if you don’t leave the area now.”
Watch the footage below:

Camden Council Robocop

UK surveillance watchdog group Big Brother Watch slammed Camden council for using the cameras:

“This kind of technology may be acceptable in a police state or a science fiction film, but it is absolutely not in modern Britain”, spokesman Nick Pickles told the London Telegraph.
“The idea that a Robocop recording will tackle antisocial behaviour and crime is as laughable as it is a total invasion of privacy. Who knew councils had the authority to take your photograph simply because you walked into a communal garden?” Pickles added.
Camden council responded by claiming that the vocal element of the cameras was activated “by mistake” and “will be deactivated as soon as possible.”
In a telling admission, a council statement noted “All flash cameras have the capacity to deliver voice messages when activated.”
“In this instance it appears that voice messages were inadvertently activated when the camera batteries were replaced four to five weeks ago.” the statement added.
“We do not want to stop residents from enjoying their open spaces and communal areas and under no circumstances would we want voice messages to be used in areas where they may be disturbed.” the statement continued.
Infowars first reported on the phenomenon of shouting cameras in 2006, after reports that the technology was being rolled out in Britain.

It was even suggested by some within government that some of the cameras may be fitted to speak in the voices of children in a bizarre psychological move to make people subjected to them more compliant.
Since that time, the technology has become more widespread, and more sophisticated with cameras now ready to lip-read, record conversations, use x-ray scans to see through people’s clothes, check faces against criminal databases, automativally detect ‘suspicious’ behaviour and even predict crimes before they take place.

Real Big Brother	Small | Large

With millions of CCTV cameras installed in London alone, one wonders just how many of these features are already in operation or could be activated with a flick of a switch, just like the shouting cameras discovered in Camden.

[pringaete]

¿Censurar hinternec? ¿Quién ha dicho que haga falta censurar hinternec si ya si eso, ella sola...?

Independencia informativa

Esta fue hace un año o así, y es doble. Me escriben de un periódico online ofreciéndome trabajo. Les digo que podría interesarme sólo si me hacen contrato con nómina -algo que entonces era mi mayor interés- y me dicen que de los 15 que colaboran en el medio, sólo tiene contrato el informático. A las pocas semanas me llaman de otra web parecida pero que apenas es conocida y tiene muy pocas visitas. Rechazo el trabajo por lo mismo pero antes le pregunto cómo es posible que con el par de banners que tienen puedan pagar a las 6 personas que hacen todo el trabajo si apenas tienen visitas. Me confiesa “en confianza” que no viven de los banners, que las empresas no sólo pagan por los clicks, también por lo que se hable –y cómo se hable- de ellas en los textos que en resúmenes de prensa “llegan a quien deben llegar”.

Me pregunto cuántos medios vivirán de eso y me asusto pensando en por qué no he leído nada acerca de esto…en ningún medio.

http://www.euribor.com.es/2012/02/06/cotilleando/

[Reg]

La verdad es que no entiendo a estos que nos gobiernan, no tengo claro si son imbéciles, estúpidos o simplemente idiotas. Me parece más sencillo arreglar el desaguisado, que este camino hacia la edad media que están siguiendo. Si no son capaces de controlar una central nuclear, un banco, ni ganar una guerra ¿Cómo esperan poder controlar a la población?

[Aire Mutable]

En mi opinión, precisamente la población es lo más fácil de dominar, en especial por el grado de borreguismo en el que se encuentra. ¿No ves que la ciudadanía parece anestesiada, esperandolas venir como el animal que va al matadero?

[Anteo]

En mi opinión, precisamente la población es lo más fácil de dominar, en especial por el grado de borreguismo en el que se encuentra. ¿No ves que la ciudadanía parece anestesiada, esperandolas venir como el animal que va al matadero?

De hecho, lo que asegura que la crisis moral es absoluta y aniquiladora, no es que las "élites" hagan y deshagan a su antojo, sino que la plebe, el famoso 99%, ha aceptado Matrix como lo normal.

Una de las últimas conclusiones de cualquier minianalista como nosotros, es darse cuenta de que la raza humana se ha dividido en castas sin esperanza de cambio: monstruosos Morlocks manejahilos, y Eloi descerebrados mantenidos. Y una minoría sin poder no cambiará nunca eso.

Hay sociedades que están aguantando (Blue Banana, Japón y cores de los antiguos Dominion de la Commonwealth), pero irán cayendo hasta que todo sea Tercer Mundo.

Mi humilde opinión es que sólo podrá cambiarlo la técnica, pero surgirá de forma fortuita, nunca buscada, como ha ocurrido con Internet. De cualquier manera, si surge de forma demasiado puntual o poco continuada, el destino de estos pequeños brotes tecnosociales será el de brutales ataques que apagarán la llama, como estamos viendo.

[Reg]

Pero dominar no es lo mismo que controlar. Como has apuntado aparecerán imprevistos a los que se lanzarán como jaurías, como con Internet, y llevan veinte años dándole con lo de los pederastas, los piratas, los juanquers, el Mitnikz y la cúpula de anonymous, y todavía no lo han conseguido del todo. Nuevas tecnologías y retos se les harán todavía más complicados de controlar, por ejemplo si sale adelante el bitcoin. En lo económico parece que se va a implantar el modelo chino para la población, ¿Serán capaces de implantarlo en el resto de las actividades sociales?

[1929]

[url][http://www.prisonplanet.com/chinese-government-demands-250-million-internet-users-provide-real-identities.html/url]

Chinese Government Demands 250 Million Internet Users Provide Real Identities
                   
New web censorship assault stokes fears of Communist repression

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com

Thursday, February 9, 2012

The Communist Chinese government has demanded some 250 million users of the Twitter-style micro-blogging platform Weibo provide their real names, addresses and identity numbers, marking a new era of Internet censorship and one that the likes of Joe Lieberman want to see enforced in the United States.

From March 16, Weibo account holders will be forced to provide their real names, addresses, and passport or ID card numbers if they are to continue to use the service.
“This rule could mean more frequent real-world consequences for posters of messages disapproved of by Party authorities,” reports NDT Television, noting how “Sina and other microblog companies are also to soon have Chinese Communist Party monitoring units established in their corporate structures.”
Fear that authorities could use the information to target those who make anti-Communist statements or criticize government officials has led to a massive drop in people signing up for the service. New sign-ups are down from 20 million to 2.5 million a month, a drop of 85 percent. Weibo currently has around 250 million account holders.
Some 8 million foreign users of the service have expressed confusion about how they will be affected by the demand for identification information, with Weibo representatives none the wiser.
Weibo’s popularity has been aided by the fact that both Twitter and Facebook are banned in China.
The ruling Communist Party routinely censors keywords and scrubs entire conversations from Weibo over politically sensitive issues such as the wave of uprisings and demonstrations that have swept the country in recent years. The recent controversy over a Chinese police chief who tried to defect was hastily censored by Weibo by order of the state.

Indeed, the primary purpose behind China’s system of Internet censorship is to mute criticism of the state and silence those who have been violently oppressed. The government shut down web access in the south-western province of Sichuan last month after two Tibetans were shot dead by Chinese troops during riots and unrest.
This makes Senator Joe Lieberman’s call for the U.S. government to be handed similar ‘kill switch’ powers all the more chilling. “Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too,” Lieberman, who has been at the forefront of the “cybersecurity” agenda, told CNN in 2010.


However, China’s vice-like grip over its Internet systems has very little to do with “war” and everything to do with silencing all dissent against the state.
China has exercised its power to shut down the Internet, something that Lieberman wants to introduce in the U.S., at politically sensitive times in order to stem the flow of information about government abuse and atrocities. During the anti-government riots which occurred in July 2009, the Chinese government completely shut down the Internet across the entire northwestern region of Xinjiang for days.
The push to end Internet anonymity once and for all and force web users to obtain a de facto permission slip from the government to post content is the ultimate endgame of the Internet censorship offensive that has gripped the United States in numerous different guises over the past few years.
The so-called “National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace,” created by NIST under the auspices of the U.S. Commerce Department and enthusiastically promoted by the Obama administration, purports to offer an “identity ecosystem” under which Americans will be able to protect their information not with passwords but with a “single credential” stored on a smart card, a cell phone, a keychain fob or some other kind of gadget. This will then be used to access a myriad of data, including tax returns, health information, bank accounts and more, amounting to a passport for your entire life.

[Spielzeug]

Viene de este otro hilo:
http://www.transicionestructural.net/las-cloacas-del-sistema/democracia-y-control-social-pensamiento-dicotomico-etiquetaje-y-pnl/

Pero tal vez encaje mejor aqui:

Una vez más y como siempre, la realidad supera a la ficción...

http://alt1040.com/2012/02/nuevas-camaras-de-vigilancia-en-reino-unido-tambien-dan-ordenes

Nuevas cámaras de vigilancia en Reino Unido también dan órdenes



La esquizofrenia y paranoía de gobiernos del “primer mundo” están llegando a los niveles más bajos posibles. El nuevo gadget de seguridad que esta causando controversia en Reino Unido es un poste de luz con cámara de vigilancia integrada, que además, da órdenes:

    Stop, this is a restricted area and your photograph is being taken. It will be sent for processing if you don’t leave the area now.

Alto, esta es un área reestringida y se le esta tomando una fotografía. Será enviada para ser procesada si usted no abandona el área ahora.

Sigamos con Sun Tzu:

El arte de la guerra se basa en el engaño. Por lo tanto, cuando es capaz de atacar, ha de aparentar incapacidad; cuando las tropas se mueven, aparentar inactividad. Si está cerca del enemigo, ha de hacerle creer que está lejos; si está lejos, aparentar que se está cerca.

http://www.20minutos.es/noticia/1275637/0/estados-unidos/vigila/redes-sociales/

El centro de comando del Departamento de Seguridad Nacional de Estados Unidos supervisa rutinariamente decenas de páginas populares en Internet como Facebook, Twitter, Hulu y WikiLeaks, así como páginas de noticias y sitios como Huffington Post y Drudge Report, según un informe gubernamental.
[...]
El documento indica que desde junio del 2010 se realiza una supervisión de lo publicado en redes sociales y otras páginas, siendo habitual la revisión de “foros, blogs, páginas web y tablones de mensajes disponibles públicamente online”.

Sun Tzu: "Haz que los adversarios vean como extraordinario lo que es ordinario
para ti; haz que vean como ordinario lo que es extraordinario para ti"

En mi opinion, el tema de las camaras de seguridad o de la supervision gubernamental de internet o de las redes sociales intenta que seamos nosotros mismos los que nos autocensuremos ante la imposibilidad de una vigilancia efectiva. Solo para "controlar" el contenido de burbuja serian necesarias varias personas dedicadas en exclusiva y ademas actuando con el convencimiento de que lo que hacen es "bueno" (interesante a este respecto es la pelicula "la vida de los otros", si el vigilante no cree que lo que hace es bueno, deja de hacerlo)

La idea es fomentar nuestros miedos de forma que sintamos mania persecutoria (delirio latente en todos nosotros) absteniendonos de esta forma de manifestar opiniones que consideremos "peligrosas" frente a un enemigo al que otorgamos la cualidad divina de la omnisciencia (el ojo que todo lo ve). La autocensura gracias al miedo a posibles consecuencias, es mucho mas efectiva que la censura ya que esta requiere de muchisimos medios y de gente convencida de que lo que hace es bueno (algo dificil de conseguir ya que la gente defiende la libertad de expresion y el propio sistema condena la censura para evitar que los mass media controlados por ellos puedan ser atacados).

El control social es ideologico. No nos pastorean: nos pastoreamos nosotros mismos.