Los administradores de TransicionEstructural no se responsabilizan de las opiniones vertidas por los usuarios del foro. Cada usuario asume la responsabilidad de los comentarios publicados.
0 Usuarios y 16 Visitantes están viendo este tema.
Is it really a bubble?We’ll probably know in five years’ timeThe good kind of bubbles © AFP via Getty ImagesIf you’re a fund manager, a bubble is a) something that has delivered sky-high returns, and; b) a thing you don’t own. Your clients are going to ask why you missed it. One good reason for not owning it is because the thing in question is in a bubble. And, well, bubbles burst.Unusually, even people at the centre of the AI boom now say it’s a bubble. Jeff Bezos think’s we’re in a “good” type of bubble. Anthropic-backer Hemant Taneja, chief executive of venture capital firm General Catalyst, reckons “of course there’s a bubble”. And Sam Altman, OpenAI’s chief executive, responded recently to the question of an AI bubble with the soothing words: “I do think some investors are likely to lose a lot of money.”Where does Goldman Sachs sit? Well, the most recent view of the bank’s chief global equity strategist Peter Oppenheimer is: “Not a bubble . . . yet.”OK, so the report’s a few weeks old. But it’s recently been reissued as a slide deck, discussed in Goldman’s podcast and recycled into a general readership blog, so Alphaville thought we’d revisit it.One set of numbers jumped out at us so we thought we’d sling them into a chart and share them with you.Here Oppenheimer compares the potentially bubblicious Mag7 to things that people have, in general, agreed to have definitely been bubbles. On a 24 month forward price/earnings ratio the Mag7 look unbubbly compared to the largest firms from the Tech Bubble of 2000, the Japanese Bubble of 1989 and even the Nifty 50 Bubble of 1973:So nothing to see here — except for meme-stonk Tesla.On a price-to-book basis the technology, media and telecoms sector is richer than the 2000 peak, but trailing return on equity has been higher — maybe making the valuation comparison a dud. And market-implied dividend growth (using a three-stage dividend discount model) is still below the tech bubble peaks, though not by much.Oppenheimer makes the point that high return on equity, net income margins, and huge capex support the case that this time is different. Still, it wouldn’t hurt to diversify away from the US tech giants, GS reckons. You know, just in case.Because while Wall Street isn’t calling time on this party, things are starting to look maybe a little pricey.
https://www.ft.com/content/e65579d3-f513-44f4-91e0-246fefe66e4cCitarIs it really a bubble?We’ll probably know in five years’ timeThe good kind of bubbles © AFP via Getty ImagesIf you’re a fund manager, a bubble is a) something that has delivered sky-high returns, and; b) a thing you don’t own. Your clients are going to ask why you missed it. One good reason for not owning it is because the thing in question is in a bubble. And, well, bubbles burst.Unusually, even people at the centre of the AI boom now say it’s a bubble. Jeff Bezos think’s we’re in a “good” type of bubble. Anthropic-backer Hemant Taneja, chief executive of venture capital firm General Catalyst, reckons “of course there’s a bubble”. And Sam Altman, OpenAI’s chief executive, responded recently to the question of an AI bubble with the soothing words: “I do think some investors are likely to lose a lot of money.”Where does Goldman Sachs sit? Well, the most recent view of the bank’s chief global equity strategist Peter Oppenheimer is: “Not a bubble . . . yet.”OK, so the report’s a few weeks old. But it’s recently been reissued as a slide deck, discussed in Goldman’s podcast and recycled into a general readership blog, so Alphaville thought we’d revisit it.One set of numbers jumped out at us so we thought we’d sling them into a chart and share them with you.Here Oppenheimer compares the potentially bubblicious Mag7 to things that people have, in general, agreed to have definitely been bubbles. On a 24 month forward price/earnings ratio the Mag7 look unbubbly compared to the largest firms from the Tech Bubble of 2000, the Japanese Bubble of 1989 and even the Nifty 50 Bubble of 1973:So nothing to see here — except for meme-stonk Tesla.On a price-to-book basis the technology, media and telecoms sector is richer than the 2000 peak, but trailing return on equity has been higher — maybe making the valuation comparison a dud. And market-implied dividend growth (using a three-stage dividend discount model) is still below the tech bubble peaks, though not by much.Oppenheimer makes the point that high return on equity, net income margins, and huge capex support the case that this time is different. Still, it wouldn’t hurt to diversify away from the US tech giants, GS reckons. You know, just in case.Because while Wall Street isn’t calling time on this party, things are starting to look maybe a little pricey.
Las acciones de Uber suben tras anunciar una gran red de vehículos autónomos con NVIDIA
https://www.elconfidencial.com/inmobiliario/residencial/2025-10-29/precio-alquiler-venta-grandes-fondos_4236974/http://archive.today/ORGLDCitarESTRATEGIA DE SALIDALos grandes fondos se encomiendan al troceo y la reventa para salir del ladrillo españolBlackstone, Hines, Patrizia, Cerberus, Azora... Los grandes fondos han pulsado el botón de las ventas. Pero, para hacerlo al precio que quieren, necesitan trocear y jugar a la reventa[...]
ESTRATEGIA DE SALIDALos grandes fondos se encomiendan al troceo y la reventa para salir del ladrillo españolBlackstone, Hines, Patrizia, Cerberus, Azora... Los grandes fondos han pulsado el botón de las ventas. Pero, para hacerlo al precio que quieren, necesitan trocear y jugar a la reventa[...]
En cualquier caso, un número muy importante que explica el mantra que se ha instalado entre los grandes fondos de que la solución a sus problemas pasa por regar estos procesos de venta con el caramelo de futuras reventas. La jugada consiste en convencer al comprador de la oportunidad única que tiene de hacerse con un jugoso lote de viviendas, ahora que se habla tanto de la escasez de hogares que padece España.
Por cierto, Uber también entra en los gráficos de los círculos esos tan majos.CitarLas acciones de Uber suben tras anunciar una gran red de vehículos autónomos con NVIDIAhttps://es.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/las-acciones-de-uber-suben-tras-anunciar-una-gran-red-de-vehiculos-autonomos-con-nvidia-93CH-3363550