www.transicionestructural.NET es un nuevo foro, que a partir del 25/06/2012 se ha separado de su homónimo .COM. No se compartirán nuevos mensajes o usuarios a partir de dicho día.
0 Usuarios y 13 Visitantes están viendo este tema.
Cita de: El afilador en Enero 12, 2021, 15:29:45 pmCita de: Negrule en Enero 12, 2021, 14:57:57 pmEl envejecimiento de la población impactará en el precio de la vivienda, pero no de la forma que se esperabaEl aumento de la esperanza de vida y las mejoras sanitarias rompen las previsiones[...]Es más, estos expertos creen que incluso estaría ocurriendo lo contrario: "Los jubilados podrían estar invirtiendo sus pensiones en la compra de vivienda u otros activos para recibir una renta regular por el alquiler, en lugar de depender de sus hijos, lo que hace que aumente la demanda de vivienda y los precios de la misma. En consecuencia, es un desafío hacer conjeturas sobre la relación entre el envejecimiento de la población y los precios de la vivienda".[...] Que cuenten las mejoras de la esperanza de vida y la sanidad a los 100.000 muertos que tendremos dentro de unos meses por la mediocre gestión del Covid-19.¡Que nunca baja, malditos!Esa es otra. Será mucho o poco, pero tiene que ser necesariamente notable el impacto de todas estas muertes extra en edades avanzadas en muchas partes del mundo. Y ya veremos EE.UU. donde ese problema generacional también existe y tienen un sistema de lo peor para lidiar con todos los factores afectados por el virus.El tiempo pasa, y la gente se va muriendo. Veremos qué ocurre cuando se invierta el crecimiento de población. Supongo que empezarán a obligar a los niños a vivir sólos y les endiñarán una hipoteca o algo, para que no pierdan los hinverzoreh.
Cita de: Negrule en Enero 12, 2021, 14:57:57 pmEl envejecimiento de la población impactará en el precio de la vivienda, pero no de la forma que se esperabaEl aumento de la esperanza de vida y las mejoras sanitarias rompen las previsiones[...]Es más, estos expertos creen que incluso estaría ocurriendo lo contrario: "Los jubilados podrían estar invirtiendo sus pensiones en la compra de vivienda u otros activos para recibir una renta regular por el alquiler, en lugar de depender de sus hijos, lo que hace que aumente la demanda de vivienda y los precios de la misma. En consecuencia, es un desafío hacer conjeturas sobre la relación entre el envejecimiento de la población y los precios de la vivienda".[...] Que cuenten las mejoras de la esperanza de vida y la sanidad a los 100.000 muertos que tendremos dentro de unos meses por la mediocre gestión del Covid-19.¡Que nunca baja, malditos!
El envejecimiento de la población impactará en el precio de la vivienda, pero no de la forma que se esperabaEl aumento de la esperanza de vida y las mejoras sanitarias rompen las previsiones[...]Es más, estos expertos creen que incluso estaría ocurriendo lo contrario: "Los jubilados podrían estar invirtiendo sus pensiones en la compra de vivienda u otros activos para recibir una renta regular por el alquiler, en lugar de depender de sus hijos, lo que hace que aumente la demanda de vivienda y los precios de la misma. En consecuencia, es un desafío hacer conjeturas sobre la relación entre el envejecimiento de la población y los precios de la vivienda".[...]
Citarhttps://www.eleconomista.es/vivienda/noticias/10985150/01/21/El-envejecimiento-de-la-poblacion-impactara-en-el-precio-de-la-vivienda-pero-no-de-la-forma-que-se-esperaba.htmlClaro, porque estadísticamente, esta gente no se va a morir nunca. Y además, no hay muchos intereses en que no caiga el precio...Alguien me dijo hace no mucho (cosa de semanas) que estaba convencidísimo de que sin duda ninguna dentro de 20 años la gente iba a vivir rutinariamente hasta los 110 y 120 años, o incluso más, por los "avances médicos".Me pregunto en qué puto mundo vive esta gente.El precio va a ser aguantado todo lo que se pueda, hasta que deje de poderse. Y no va a importar la cantidad de artículos chorra que publiquen pseudoperiódicos de mierda.
https://www.eleconomista.es/vivienda/noticias/10985150/01/21/El-envejecimiento-de-la-poblacion-impactara-en-el-precio-de-la-vivienda-pero-no-de-la-forma-que-se-esperaba.html
El espejo al que podemos mirarnos: Japón.Deuda alta, sueldos estancados y sin acceso a vivienda.Citarhttps://magnet.xataka.com/un-mundo-fascinante/generacion-perdida-japonesa-sigue-paro-casarse-viviendo-sus-padres-perdida-verdadLa generación perdida japonesa sigue en paro, sin casarse y viviendo con sus padres. Perdida de verdad
https://magnet.xataka.com/un-mundo-fascinante/generacion-perdida-japonesa-sigue-paro-casarse-viviendo-sus-padres-perdida-verdadLa generación perdida japonesa sigue en paro, sin casarse y viviendo con sus padres. Perdida de verdad
Buffff...qué turbio suena todo (tanto aviso a tanto navegante )...Sabemos lo que ocurre y adónde hay que llegar, pero lo que hay por medio es como el mar de los Sargazos https://cincodias.elpais.com/cincodias/2021/01/12/economia/1610479941_660281.htmlCitarHernández de Cos cree que es el momento de cambiar los ICO por ayudas directas a las empresasInsta a limitar la armonización fiscal dando margen a las comunidades para actuarEl gobernador del Banco de España, Pablo Hernández de Cos, ha considerado este martes que la línea de financiación del ICO ha sido "absolutamente fundamental", pero considera que es el momento de que se cambien por ayudas directas a las empresas en un momento que están "mucho más endeudadas".
Hernández de Cos cree que es el momento de cambiar los ICO por ayudas directas a las empresasInsta a limitar la armonización fiscal dando margen a las comunidades para actuarEl gobernador del Banco de España, Pablo Hernández de Cos, ha considerado este martes que la línea de financiación del ICO ha sido "absolutamente fundamental", pero considera que es el momento de que se cambien por ayudas directas a las empresas en un momento que están "mucho más endeudadas".
Es como una plaga bíblica... https://news.sky.com/story/covid-19-nhs-eyeing-plans-to-move-hospital-patients-into-hotels-as-hancock-says-end-of-restrictions-impossible-to-know-12186538...
[...] ... sabiendo que serán los últimos en caer.
[...] Envié un whasapp hace unas semanas justo con esa frase. Cuando UK aprobó la vacuna de Pfizer primero. Algo así como que Yahvé se cabrea porque los ingleses se pasan de listos, y manda una mutación más contagiosa. Obviamente si pensamos en conspiración, la mutación no sería mas contagiosa y se usaría para controlar aun mas a la poblacion.
Janet Yellen’s Treasury confirmation hearing scheduled for January 19Open up your calendar and highlight January 19.That is when former Federal Reserve Chair Jane Yellen’s confirming hearing for her nomination to the Treasury Department is scheduled.Her appointment is likely to be approved rather quickly, with Incoming Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) wanting “key economic nominees confirmed and on the job ASAP.”If confirmed, she will be the first woman to serve as the head of the Treasury Department and also the oldest person to hold the position.What can you expect with Yellen at the helm? Not much difference from her predecessors: spend, baby, spend.
ECB's Lagarde pushes back on gloomy forecasts, sticks to recovery outlookFRANKFURT (Reuters) - European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde pushed back on Wednesday against economic pessimism, arguing that a rebound will come as pandemic uncertainty declines and that Europe possesses all the tools needed to overcome the crisis.Even with much of the 19-member euro area in lockdown, Lagarde continued to predict a recovery, provided that economic restrictions can be lifted from the second quarter and the bloc can overcome a “laborious” start to vaccinations.Only last month, the ECB cut its growth forecast to 3.9% this year but increasingly widespread curbs on movement and activity in countries including Germany and France, along with the slow rollout of vaccines, are already challenging that outlook, just two weeks into 2021.“I think our last projections in December are still very clearly plausible,” Lagarde said in an interview at the Reuters Next conference. “Our forecast is predicated on lockdown measures until the end of the first quarter.”The ECB said on Dec. 10 that its forecasts assumed “sufficient” levels of herd immunity would be reached before the end of 2021.“What would be a concern would be that after the end of March those member states still need to have lockdown measures and if, for instance, vaccination programmes were slowed down,” she added.“VERY ATTENTIVE”The euro’s persistent rise against the dollar also risks dampening growth and inflation but Lagarde maintained the ECB’s cautious tone, despite big moves around the turn of the year.“We are very attentive, we will continue to being extremely attentive to the impact on prices that the exchange rates have,” she said, adding that the ECB does not target any particular exchange rate level.Private sector economists are already cutting their growth projections, with Bank of America now predicting a 2.9% expansion - a full percentage point below its previous forecast.To support the euro zone, the ECB has already extended ultra-easy policy into 2022, but with borrowing costs at record lows and well into negative territory in some euro zone countries, its remaining stimulus firepower is limited.Lagarde said the ECB could expand its bond-buying stimulus programme again if needed, but might also refrain from using the entire 1.850 trillion euro ($2.25 trillion) envelope it has earmarked for purchases if the crisis passes.“If the envelope that we have agreed upon is excessive and we don’t need the entire envelope, so be it,” she said. “We will buy adequately in order to stick to our goal of favourable financing conditions. If more is needed, we will recalibrate.”Lagarde also pushed back on calls for the bank to publish its new inflation target before its overarching policy review is fully completed, arguing that a “very large” group within the Governing Council is keen for a single package. The review’s results are expected around mid-year.
ECB's Lagarde calls for regulating Bitcoin's "funny business"FRANKFURT (Reuters) - European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde called on Wednesday for global regulation of Bitcoin, saying the digital currency had been used for money laundering activities in some instances and that any loopholes needed to be closed.Bitcoin has come out of its niche in recent years and is now bought by ordinary people, investment funds and even large corporations. Some have even taken out loans to buy more of the cryptocurrency, whose value has increased almost tenfold since last March.But its largely anonymous nature has raised concerns that it could be used for money laundering and other illegal activities.“(Bitcoin) is a highly speculative asset, which has conducted some funny business and some interesting and totally reprehensible money laundering activity,” Lagarde said in an interview at the Reuters Next conference.(...)
What can you expect with Yellen at the helm? Not much difference from her predecessors: spend, baby, spend.
Un juez obliga por primera vez a rebajar a la mitad un alquiler comercial por la covidSe trata de una sentencia del Juzgado número 20 de Barcelona. Es la primera de este tipo en España.[...]https://www.vozpopuli.com/economia-y-finanzas/juez-alquiler-comercial-mitad-covid_0_1427858367.html
The Hindsight Depression(...)A depression is characterized by a sustained downturn in economic activity, often with a major banking crises occurring as well. Advanced technology can disguise its effects, mitigating them in some ways, and the soaring values of tech stocks can conceal the economic rot under the surface.Another way to put it, is that if you had to go through a depression in the 1930s or the 2010s, it’s preferable to do it in the 2010s, when technology is way better.And yet, when assessing the macroeconomic landscape and thinking about overall asset allocation, it helps to contextualize the fact that, if we strip away the high-tech veneer, we’ve been in a twelve-year mild depression in the United States. This also holds true for large swaths of the world including Europe, Japan, and Latin America.This depression was due to a series of events including the bursting of a long-term debt cycle in the United States, Japan, and Europe, followed by a strong dollar period and a gradual breakdown in the functioning of the global monetary system. We haven’t had a true global economic “boom” in over a decade, and are facing a demographics shift.The Long-Term Debt CycleThis is a chart of total debt as a percentage of the GDP over the past 100 years for the United States, along with short-term interest rates:And here’s a chart that shows federal debt held by the public as a percentage of GDP and nonfederal debt as a percentage of GDP as separate items, showing the one-two punch of a private debt bubble and a public debt bubble about a decade apart that characterizes the peak of a long-term debt cycle:A comparison I’ve made a number of times over the past year is that in many ways the 2010s were a lot like the 1930s, and the 2020s are shaping up to be a lot like the 1940s, in terms of monetary and fiscal policy.(...)2010s: Private Debt Bubble, Banking Crisis, DisinflationAfter the 2007 peak, a recession and major asset price collapse began. Total debt as a percentage of GDP peaked in 2009, but it was primarily a private debt bubble. Federal debt as a percentage of GDP was moderate (about 65%) at the start of the crisis, but quickly grew to over 100% in the subsequent years as the private debt bubble was mainly pushed up to the sovereign level. The massive private deleveraging resulted in a bank crisis and the biggest economic contraction since the Great Depression. Banks were recapitalized via quantitative easing, but due to the major destruction in other net worth (stocks and houses) and several deflationary forces, and the fact that broad money supply didn’t expand very quickly, it was still a disinflationary environment rather than an inflationary environment.2020s: Federal Debt Bubble, Pandemic MMT, Inflation?By 2020, private debt had gone flat for a while as a percentage of GDP (household debt was down while corporate debt was up), but federal debt began skyrocketing from an already high 106% of GDP baseline due to the pandemic and subsequent economic shutdown. Federal deficits reaching 15-20% of GDP in 2020 approached World War II levels for the first time in modern history, resulting in federal debt levels rapidly moving to 125-130% of GDP and likely higher in the years ahead. The Federal Reserve began discussing yield curve control as an option, and bought a massive amount of Treasuries in mid-March when foreigners and hedge funds sold hundreds of billion in Treasuries, and the Fed continues to buy a significant percentage of Treasury issuance out of necessity. Unlike the 2010s, the broad money supply went up extremely quickly in 2020, because banks were already well-capitalized in this environment, so the combination of fiscal spending and QE (“pandemic MMT”) injected those funds directly into the economy, much like the 1940s.The biggest difference in terms of policy choices between the Hindsight Depression and the Great Depression, was the response time for the bank recapitalization and money-printing. In the early 1930s, it took about 3 years to do, while in the late 2000s, it took only months. As a result, during this second go-around, less private deleveraging was allowed to occur, fewer banks failed, asset prices were more quickly reflated, and money supply kept going up with no dip:However, when we stop looking at things in dollar terms (because they are, after all, expanding in number so rapidly these days), and start looking at things in terms of fundamentals, we can see the similarities between the two depressions more clearly.(...)2020s: Populism and Pandemic MMTMy base case is for a rather fast growth rate in the broad money supply throughout the 2020s, due to the combination of large fiscal deficits and continual central bank balance sheet expansion to finance those deficits on the secondary market.If that’s the case, the 2020s could look quite a bit different than the 1930s or 2010s; perhaps more like the 1940s or 1970s in some ways, at least in terms of inflation and the commodity cycle.Meanwhile, the jobs market has been weak. Rather than a “V-shaped” recovery in jobs, it has been a “backward square root sign” recovery. This chart shows the number of people employed in the US:(...)The US dollar seems to be undergoing its third major bear market within the post-1971 system vs a basket of major currencies, which tends to be very good for commodities and emerging markets:It’ll have bounces along the way, and we’re currently in one of those bounces, but it’ll be key to watch the multi-quarter and multi-year trends here.Besides the dollar specifically, most fiat currencies are debasing vs hard assets, due to interest rates that are below the prevailing inflation rate, along with rapid growth in the broad money supply.Commodities have been in a bear market period of oversupply during the past 12 years, due to a combination of emerging markets slowing down, the dollar strengthening, and the rise in production of unprofitable shale oil. However, the commodities cycle may have bottomed in 2020, particularly when the price of WTI crude went briefly negative.The investment bank Stifel, with a chart shown in this MarketWatch article from several months ago, directly links populism and reflationary commodity bull markets over the past two centuries:(...)