www.transicionestructural.NET es un nuevo foro, que a partir del 25/06/2012 se ha separado de su homónimo .COM. No se compartirán nuevos mensajes o usuarios a partir de dicho día.
0 Usuarios y 6 Visitantes están viendo este tema.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-uk-leaves-the-eu-36802756
Key to the negotiations will be access to the European single market, which EU leaders have said is conditional on accepting the free movement of people. Mr Davis said the "ideal outcome" would be "continued tariff-free access" to the EU single market, adding: "Once the European nations realise we will not budge on control of our borders, they will want to talk, in their own interests. "But what if they are irrational, as so many Remain-supporting commentators asserted they would be in the run-up to the referendum? "This is one of the reasons for taking a little time before triggering Article 50. The negotiating strategy has to be properly designed, with serious consultation."
Estás tomando a V. de pretexto para soltar tu hiel sobre los indios del Amazonas.
Mira, prueba a meterte con Farage o con Bo Johnson, que ésos si que hablan por hablar, y macarras, estilo inglés.
¿Esto no merece un comentario?Boris Johnson, nuevo ministro de exteriores britanico.http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/13/philip-hammond-appointed-chancellor-as-george-osborne-exits
Cita de: alpha en Julio 16, 2016, 09:36:21 am¿Esto no merece un comentario?Boris Johnson, nuevo ministro de exteriores britanico.http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/13/philip-hammond-appointed-chancellor-as-george-osborne-exits Lo merece.La mejor argumentación que he encontrado ha sido creo que en el Telegraph, donde explicaban que las intenciones de May son claras: hacer que los responsables políticos del brexit (los responsables son los electores-PDM) desciendan a los infiernos de su propia miseria intelectual, afronten las consecuencias de sus actos, y se enfrenten ELLOS a sus mentiras y a la población.Al parecer las carteras en las que van a sufrir son esta de Boris, la de agricultura que ponen al frente a otra "listilla" que tendrá que explicarles a los agricultores que se han acabado las ayudas de la UE (miles de millones de €) y que tendrán que competir a pelo, otra cartera específica para el brexit tambien con un iluminado a la cabeza, y alguna secretaría por ahí. Todas ellas auténticos campos de minas. Todas ellas con paletos arancelistas al frente.También es cierto que la acusan de irresponsable por poner a semejantes individuos al mando de nada, pero la verdad que poco más puede hacer.
Hablando de DIEM25, hay un debate bastante bien llevado sobre la reforma de instituciones UE y las cuestiones de fondo que planteanUn debate muy al estilo TE.net (cuando nos centramos Empieza aquí, después de banear a un troll (no he leido los mensajes anteriores)Lo lleva de facto un tal UffeJensen (que no está de acuerdo con el modelo federalista que grosso modo apuntan los demás))https://www.diem25.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=36&t=166&start=160Los demás re-exponen y profundizan.===Por cierto, Uffe Jensen en el plano economico es un partidario de Henry George, y lo explica muy bien en su sitio:http://rightsanddemocracy.dk/home/rightsanddemocracy/socio-economic_inclusion/how_lvt_works/index.htmlSería muy interesante comparar la LVT (Land Value Taxation) con las reformas que reclama PPCC (sin definirlas). Muchas veces me he preguntado si PPCC se ha estudiado a H:George (y antecesores) por su proximidad, pero no parece tener conciencia de ello.Pero en general el debate es constructivo y con bastantes links.
Here’s a good example of how this works in practice, with me a numerate bystander in one very important debate: does massive immigration depress wages of native workers?The proper beginning of the story is 1962 when the young George Borjas arrived as a Cuban refugee in Miami. Eventually he became an economist and was hired by Harvard. His specialty is labor economics and he is one of the foremost American experts on the consequences of immigration for labor markets.Then, in 1980 Fidel Castro allowed a mass exodus from Cuba, which became known as the Mariel boatlift. Within months more than 100,000 immigrants arrived in Miami.SourceThe following graph taken from Borjas forthcoming paper illustrates the magnitude of this this labor supply “shock,” to use economics jargon:What we see here is two initial waves during the 1960s, following the Cuban Revolution of 1959 (including Borjas as a “data point” for 1962). During the 1970s emigration from Cuba was shut down by the Castro regime. The huge spike in 1980 is the Mariel boatlift, after which emigration from Cuba was again shut down as a result of behind-the-scenes agreement between Cuba and the US. The smaller spike around 1995 is known as “Little Mariel.” More recently the increase in Cuban immigration is due to the wet-feet, dry-feet policy.What we have here is a perfect natural experiment to find out how massive immigration influxes affect the wages of native workers. The Berkeley economist David Card saw the potential of this labor supply shock and used it in a paper that was published in 1990 in Industrial and Labor Relations Review.The 1990 Card study became a classic and had been used as one of the strongest arguments in supporting the view that immigration has no negative effects for us to worry about.Now fast forward to 2015, when one summer morning George Borjas decided to revisit this analysis in light of what we have learned about immigration effects since 1990 (much of it due to Borjas own efforts). You can hear him tell the story in this video.He did something very simple, and you can actually see what he did if you watch the 6-minute section of the video that starts at c.6:30. He used the same CPS data as David Card. However, he focused only on workers that were (1) non-Hispanic (as the best approximation to the native-born), (2) aged 25-59 (prime working age), (3) male, and (4) high-school dropouts. The last characteristics is key, because 60 percent of Marielitos did not complete high school. And even many of those of the rest 40 percent, who did, were looking for unskilled jobs due to their lack of linguistic and other skills. So Marielitos competed directly with high school dropouts, and if there is an effect on the wages, this is where we should look.Borjas next compared the inflation-adjusted wages of Miami residents, who had these characteristics, to wages of the same segment of the American population in all other American metropolitan areas but Miami. And here’s what the data say:The vertical line at 1980 indicates the arrival of Marielitos. The blue curve for Miami begins diverging from the black curve (other metropolitan areas) after 1980 and the difference reaches its maximum around 1985. The reason that it takes time for the effect of labor oversupply to reach its maximum impact is that wages are, in economics jargon, “sticky”—it takes several years for them to adjust to new labor market conditions. I saw the same effect in my own analysis of the effects of labor oversupply on national wages in the US. Interestingly, I also estimated the lag effect at 5 years, although at the time I did not know of Borjas analysis (well, because I did mine two years before—in 2013).Eventually other forces come into play and the wage gap shrinks. Another divergence occurs following the Little Mariel in 1995 and the gap is not closed by the end of the series, probably due to the constant, if at a lower level, immigration into Miami. The blue band and the black dotted line are the 95% confidence limits. What they tell us is that when there is no overlap, the difference between the two curves is statistically significant—highly unlikely to happen by chance alone. In other words, the Miami wages for native-born men without high school diplomas were indeed much lower than for similar workers in other US metropolitan areas during the 1980s and then again in the late 1990s, following the two spikes of Cubans migrating to Miami. During the 1980s Miami wages were 20 percent lower than elsewhere. A very substantial effect.
[...]yes, you. you Briton there. which EU reg did you break, today? find one of your liking and do it, and report the feeling here
Me parto con Ghordius...Citar[...]yes, you. you Briton there. which EU reg did you break, today? find one of your liking and do it, and report the feeling herehttp://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-14/uk-now-front-queue-america-rushes-pass-trade-deal#comment-7829160Vamos a tener que "clonar" cierto hilo de bb.info... Algo así como:Me levanto y veo que no han invocado el Art.50
Interesante contribución sobre porqué en los USA y en RU ha habido ésa escalada de sentimientos antiinmigración, cuando no son en absoluto los mayores receptores de ésta:http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-19/which-countries-have-most-immigrants
With a 10.6% change in its foreign-born population, Spain moved from the 26th ranked country in 1990 in terms of share of foreign-born residents to 7th in 2015. This was largely due to Spain’s need for workers in the service and construction industries, sectors that could not attract native-born residents in sufficient quantities. So far, the country does not appear to be experiencing a marked rise in anti-immigration sentiment.